Talk:Peugeot RCZ
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Production date
[edit]I've tagged the infobox production date as dubious as Peugeot says the vehicle was launched in April 2010. Therefore it can't have started production in May 2010. Production is usually months before the launch, otherwise they have nothing to sell when they launch the vehicle. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 09:20, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- We don't normally need to mention the specific month, so I've suggested just sticking to year will suffice, and avoid the need for the dubious tag. Warren (talk) 11:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
- I agree with your change. I don't think an infobox needs to be quite so specific. Thanks ツ Jenova20 (email) 12:33, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Peugeot RCZ. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100601071930/http://www.peugeot.co.uk:80/Resources/Content/brochures/technical/peugeot-rcz-prices-and-specifications.pdf?model=rcz to http://www.peugeot.co.uk/Resources/Content/brochures/technical/peugeot-rcz-prices-and-specifications.pdf?model=rcz
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)