Talk:Philosophical Library
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Multiple issues
[edit]I have reviewed the article and removed the Notability, Advert, and Third-party warnings with the following reasoning. I. The company has a long and unique history, which is reflected in the article. II. I removed the "bestseller" part, which is nonsense. The books are considered classics, and possibly bestsellers, but the contemporary "classics" are decent here. III. Third party; the sources provided are solid; I have no COI, but I have some books from PL by UK authors that qualify as justification for the article without problems. Regards 17387349L8764 (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2025 (UTC)