Talk:Political gaffe
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Political gaffe article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days  |
 | The contents of the Kinsley gaffe page were merged into Political gaffe on August 29, 2012. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Behave section
[edit]This article survived deletion so I feel we should behave with it. One suggestion would be to reach consensus on criteria to have new gaffes added. If a gaffe is added and then reverted, should it be left out until consensus is reached in a new section named after that gaffe? Any thoughts by others?--Canoe1967 (talk) 01:53, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I added a 'do not archive' tag to this section. We may wish to use this section as a guideline for inclusions in the article. Feel free to edit this section to reflect this. In other words treat it like an editable article and/or template. The title may need a tweak as well.--Canoe1967 (talk) 18:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)