Talk:Professional Publishers Association

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 February 2021. The result of the discussion was keep.

It is requested that a logo be included in this article to improve its quality.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Depreciated source

I had a notice saying there is a depreciated source. I checked them all on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources and it seems that Bloomberg Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Bloomberg seems to be the problem, but it says here that Bloomberg is reliable. Would appreciate any help. The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 12:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Solved! Thanks David Gerard! :) The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 14:40, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It was easy when it was just the DM, it's a mystery game now there's lots of deprecated sources. Most annoying. I'm not sure how to get the filter to be more helpful ... - David Gerard (talk) 14:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

David Gerard. Question. In your opinion, did you think the statement about Edward Enningful OBE and Meghan Markle added any weight to the article? There are a couple of other from more (relatively!) reliable sources eg. from Business Insider, but just wondering if you felt it was necessary information? and Vogue The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 14:58, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questions, direction needed

1. The PPA accredits some university journalism and publishing programmes as well as recommending training suppliers. I can see that they do, and many different university sites support this claim, but there is nothing written about the programmes. Keep/delete?

2. The PPA is one of the seventeen Gatekeepers of the press pass, United Kingdom Press Card Association. Verifiable, but only via the press-card's own website. Keep/delete?

3. As well as publisher members,[10] the PPA runs an Associate Membership Scheme[11] for industry suppliers. Promotional and I'm not sure of encyclopedic value of this statement. However, an updated list of members could be relevant for encyclopedic value, although it will only be self-verifying. Keep/delete?

Thank you in advance. The Cleaning Laddy (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]