Talk:QRS complex

Physiology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the heart.

Medicine: Cardiology Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Cardiology task force (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled

I removed the "related waves" as they don't belong in an article specific to the QRS complex. Added link to electrocardiogram. Added image showing correct nomenclature for QRS labeling. Re-added stub tag. MoodyGroove 21:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove[reply]

Article should be deleted and QRS complex should redirect to electrocardiogram

That's my opinion. MoodyGroove 17:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)MoodyGroove[reply]

I disagree. QRS represents the contraction of the ventricles and as such is important in its own right. Keeps you alive once or twice every second :) 217.155.236.238 (talk) 21:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information request

If anybody has some literature that references normal and abnormal Voltages for the qrs complex please feel free add them. If you don't feel comfortable editing the page, leave the details in the discussion with a link and i'll take care of iteximo (talk) 16:21, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Spatial QRS-T angle

The article "Spatial QRS-T angle" reads sort of like a how-to or medical advice, is confusing, and is not linked to; I think it could be merged into "QRS complex" (probably as a new section). —Ignatzmice ^talk _contribs 21:22, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support better covered in one place rather than two small articles. --Tom (LT) (talk) 01:17, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge elsewhere. This is a subspecialist topic which isn't really appropriate for the broader audience that might follow the text on the QRS complex. I suggest a merge to Vectorcardiography, as Spatial QRS-T angle is a parameter used only in the context of this measurement technique. Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've now merged Spatial QRS-T angle to Vectorcardiography. Klbrain (talk) 14:18, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

S Wave

Could we add a section on the S wave? I believe it is the depolarisation of the medial wall of the right ventricle but some texts disagree with this... 217.155.236.238 (talk) 21:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on QRS complex. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090904214055/http://www.umm.edu:80/altmed/drugs/potassium-gluconate-104100.htm to http://www.umm.edu/altmed/drugs/potassium-gluconate-104100.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:21, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]