Talk:ROCm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ROCm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

C/C++

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology

Software: Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[LLVM#Backend|AMDGPU backend]]

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Untitled

If you have vibes of Cunningham's law in there, this is normal. Maxorazon (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Working on parameterizing the AMD GPU features template to reduce its spread.
Tried a pager with parser functions for Template:AMD_GPU_features... Didn't go well. Tackle a general pager when parsoid is done? Dropping the template with a hard substitution for now... 02:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)

I have been notified that CUDA implements really nice feature tables Maxorazon (talk) 17:12, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What does ROCm stand for? has been answered

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

I work for AMD and just wanted to give you a heads up that the "What does ROCm stand for?" question has been resolved.

What I think should be changed: Remove "Radeon Open Compute Platform"
Why it should be changed: According to https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/1628, ROCm is simply ROCm and isn't an acronym anymore.
References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): https://github.com/RadeonOpenCompute/ROCm/issues/1628

Memmett78 (talk) 23:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. [see below]

@Memmett78: I removed the acronym, there will probably need a paragraph in background to describe the policy change :) Maxorazon (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]