Talk:Recategorization

Recategorization is currently a Culture, sociology and psychology good article nominee. Nominated by Paradox38 (talk) at 04:07, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Note: I will be somewhat busy next week and may not immediately respond to a review. I expect to be more free the following week.

Short description: Phenomenon in social psychology

New Article

Hello! I just made this article as part of a class assignment. There are still changes I am planning to make to it, but I think the page could benefit from the insight of more seasoned Wikipedians.

Paradox38 (talk) 19:41, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is interesting to note that the Hewstone (2000) study that criticizes the idea that recategorization interventions can have lasting affects begins with a reference to the Rwandan Genocide, and pessimistic perceptions of the likelihood of unity in its aftermath. In the following section, I discuss the recategorization policy included in the Rwandan Constitution--perhaps the largest recategorization intervention ever attempted. Whether or not it was successful probably depends on who you ask (see Moss and Vollhardt, 2015 and Collins, Laws, and Ntakirutimana (2021)).

Paradox38 (talk) 08:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology 220A

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 30 September 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Paradox38 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Yeon Jae Hwang (talk) 06:23, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: withdrawn by nominator, closed by LunaEclipse talk 23:28, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that in 2003, Rwanda adopted a constitution that recategorized Rwandans of Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa ethnicities into one identity, banyarwanda?

Source: Beyond Conflict and Spoilt Identities: How Rwandan Leaders Justify a Single Recategorization Model for Post-Conflict Reconciliation

Authored by Sigrun Marie Moss and published in the Journal of Social and Political Psychology in 2014. PDF available at: [1] Quotes: "Since 1994,the Rwandan government has attempted to remove the division of the population into the ‘ethnic’ groups (ubwoko) Hutu, Tutsi and Twa and instead encourage people to think of themselves only in terms of a common national Rwandan identity. This approach can be classified as recategorization of social identities– a process where subordinate identities are replaced with a shared or superordinate identity in order to improve intergroup relations." ...

"This comprehensive recategorization approach is based on a meta-narrative that essentialises Rwandan unity and de-essentialises ethnic identities, in a context where alternative narratives are not permitted. The 2003 constitution forbids genocide ideology, and a 2008 addition further limits identity discussions. These strict genocide ideology laws ban everything seen as divisionism, implying limited freedom of speech on topics of identity, political power and representation."

- Reviewed:

Created by Paradox38 (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Paradox38 (talk) 19:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC).[reply]

@Paradox38: Welcome to DYK! New enough in mainspace (moved December 2) and long enough. Nominator is QPQ-exempt. The hook fact checks out. This is a promising page but needs action to proceed:
- All paragraphs beyond the lead section need to end in an inline citation. The paragraph beginning in The challenges facing might be fine since it's basically a summary of the cited paragraphs, but I see three paragraphs that have uncited portions. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 14:19, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - I've indicated them with tags. From what I understand the first two seem to be clarifying sentences, so could be removed if needed. The third one has additional content that would be more of a shame to remove. CMD (talk) 17:02, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    - The proper place to put an inline citation is not entirely clear to me. For example, for the third place marked "citation needed" (regarding the Twa feeling increasingly marginalized), the source for that is the same as the source cited in the previous sentence. Is it proper to add an inline citation to the last sentence of that paragraph, and leave the citation in the previous sentence as-is? Or should I move the citation from the second-to-last sentence in that paragraph to the last sentence in that paragraph, removing it from where it is currently? Also, is this the proper place to discuss this, given that I am withdrawing the DYK nomination? Paradox38 (talk) 21:54, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
      - Paradox38 the best practice is to have a source located at the end of all the text it is citing within one paragraph (see WP:CONSECUTIVECITE), but if you duplicate it that's not a huge issue. You can ask questions at the WP:TEAHOUSE. Per your withdrawal, marking this for closure. Best, CMD (talk) 22:59, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]