Jump to content

Talk:Roblox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 27, 2008Articles for deletionDeleted
March 12, 2010Articles for deletionNo consensus
November 24, 2012Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
August 1, 2020Peer reviewReviewed

Suggestions

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 08:55, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, a few of my suggestions:
  • Remove citations from lead per WP:CITELEAD
  • Try to make the article have a better flow. Some sentences are quite short and can easily be merged with other sentences.
  • Expand the infobox: There are many more parameters that can be filled there; there isn't even a link to the website!
  • External links should go above references (at least I believe)
  • In § Development, it seems to read as more a timeline than an actual paragraph
  • There are some sections that can easily be merged, for example § Players, is this really worth a whole section?
  • This is just my opinion, but the article seems to go into a bit too much detail. All of the sets include a code that can be used to redeem virtual items.
Once again, just some of my opinions, I may be completely wrong! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:05, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
User:Berrely, I've implemented a couple of your suggestions, there is a bit of a problem with LEADCITE, since most of the content in the lead is not actually cited elsewhere in the article, we have to keep the citations there for now, or otherwise it would fail WP:V. I'm not entirely sure how to fix that at the moment, but expanding the "Development" section (which is definitely the weakest one IMO) to include a more general overview of the history of Roblox might help, and would also help with the other problems with that section. I am fairly sure, from looking at a few prominent articles, that References are supposed to be above external links though. Devonian Wombat (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Devonian Wombat, sorry for replying so late! Apologies I was viewing on mobile and got confused by the references, you are correct on that front. The reason there shouldn't be citations in the lead is that the lead is meant to relay information already said in the article, but this is not a huge problem. Good job on massively improving this article (really comparing the current article from when you first edited it and now is astounding)! — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 09:19, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I suggest splitting the Erik Cassel article from ROBLOX; Why on earth is Erik Cassel not a separate article? Erik is a vital person to ROBLOX's history, and articles like Alex Balfanz, Uplift Games or Adopt Me! have already been developed without any questioning from the community, so the Erik Cassel page should also be a separate one from ROBLOX. This does not deserve to be a redirect page. It's way more important than that. He also doesn't have a minor appearance like the developers mentioned in this, he literally was one of the creators of the game. MatEditzWiki (talk 15:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Notability is not inherited. Every topic is evaluated separately. For Erik Cassel to have an article, reliable secondary sourcing that meets WP:GNG must be provided. -- ferret (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Good source for Erik Cassel's huge involvement in Roblox - [1][2] I believe these two together at minimum are sufficient reliable secondary sources. Countless articles from large outlets mention and build upon this trove of information. Shredux (talk) 23:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ Russell, Melia. "The lesser-known cofounder of $45 billion Roblox was the architect of its blazing success and the 'nicest guy'". Business Insider. Retrieved 2022-03-10.
  2. ^ "10 Facts You Didn't Know About The Making Of Roblox". TheGamer. 2021-02-06. Retrieved 2022-03-10.

It's Luau (no italics), right?

I would fix this myself, but I don't have adequate permissions as of right now. The Luau website seems to only use Luau on the front page to emphasize that it's different from Lua, and it uses Luau (no italics) everywhere else. Can someone correct this or explain why I'm mistaken? Based5290 :3 (talk) 21:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should Hindenburg Research's article on Roblox be added?

"Roblox: Inflated Key Metrics For Wall Street And A Pedophile Hellscape For Kids"

https://hindenburgresearch.com/roblox/

https://kotaku.com/roblox-hindenburg-report-pedophile-hellscape-for-kids-1851668649

https://www.reuters.com/technology/hindenburg-research-takes-short-position-roblox-2024-10-08/ Cvexreos (talk) 08:49, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just added today's article in The Guardian about this research. Funcrunch (talk) 15:30, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding DynaBlocks

Evidence suggests that Roblox has been known as "Roblox" since the beginning of 2004, rather than being renamed from "DynaBlocks" in 2005 like the article claims.

In the publicly-available PowerPoint slides of a Casual Connect USA 2013 presentation delivered by David Baszucki, it is stated that both "DynaBlocks" and "GoBlocks" were "potential names" for Roblox, implying that they were ultimately unused. The domains dynablocks.com, dynablock.com, and goblocks.com were registered in December 2003, while roblox.com was registered in January 2004. The company was incorporated as "Roblox Corporation" in March 2004. From the site itself, the earliest surviving forum post from July 2004 and login page from August 2004 both refer to the platform as "Roblox".

Seems that "DynaBlocks" was nothing more than a working title that was discarded very early in Roblox's development, only going on to be used as a redirect to roblox.com. So where did the whole "Roblox was DynaBlocks till 2005" claim come from? Seems that it was an unsourced claim added to the article in August 2014, as the BusinessWeek source next to the claim was present in the article before the edit and makes no mention of DynaBlocks. It can be inferred that the article's current source for the claim, a Your Tech Story post from 2019, sourced this information from the wiki article itself, which would make its inclusion a case of WP:CIRCULAR.

The article should be corrected to state that "DynaBlocks" and "GoBlocks" were working titles for Roblox, and the claim that the company renamed to "Roblox" in 2005 should be removed. Mystyle48 (talk) 18:56, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding information about Turkey banning Roblox because of child exploitation

Hello. Someone should add a mention about Roblox being banned in Turkey in the "Alleged exploitative practices towards children" section and maybe also that it's being investigated in Brazil. Also, why is there no "See also" section? Wiktorpyk (talk) 09:53, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Should we make "Block Tales" an Article?

Should we make the game "Block Tales" a separate article, or should we put it inside of Roblox?

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 20:26, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Roblox pronunciation

Hello,


I created a pronunciation example for this word.


LL-Q1860 (eng)-Flame, not lame-Roblox.wavⓘ


Thank you Flame, not lame 💔 (Don't talk to me.) 00:55, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Toadspike [Talk] 12:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The UAE unbanned Roblox in 2021

The UAE lifted Roblox' ban in 2021 but this article still has the UAE as one of the countries that banned Roblox, this needs to be updated because it's outdated information. AhmedEdits (talk) 13:12, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Roblox&oldid=1265593724"