Talk:Romances (Luis Miguel album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Romances (Luis Miguel album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Romances (Luis Miguel album) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on February 14, 2015.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
June 19, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
July 27, 2011	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
November 7, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed
November 20, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed
May 20, 2012	Featured article candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Chaosdruid, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 05 July 2011.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Latin music High‑importance

	Latin music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin music (music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and the languages of Ibero-America, see project scope for more details) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin musicWikipedia:WikiProject Latin musicTemplate:WikiProject Latin musicLatin music articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Raise claimed sales?

I think the sales for this album are little outdated. the only reliable source comes from Warner Music International, published by Billboard in 1999. Any thoughts? Franlm14 (talk) 19:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Franlm14 I'd ask @Apoxyomenus: on this honestly. Erick (talk) 22:19, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have problem in raising claimed sales if there are reliable sources. Based on its chart performance and available sales, anything between 6-7M could fit fine. --Apoxyomenus (talk) 03:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense thank you. The thing is there is not source for that unfortunately. By 2002 a few sources claims 23 million for the four bolero albums, thats why I thought this one and Segundo Romance are a bit low. Franlm14 (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]