Please note that this talk page is for discussion of changes to the Samsung article. Off-topic discussions are not appropriate for Wikipedia and will be REMOVED. Thank you for your cooperation.
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
Page history
Samsung Electro-Mechanics was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 23 February 2012 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Samsung. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Specific text to be added or removed: Present tense terms in "History - 1970-1990"
Reason for the change: The paragraph detailing the United States International Trade Commission order of Samsung Group of South Korea unlawfully selling computer chips seems to be (partly) written in present tense, including phrases like "within the coming weeks", while it seems to cite it's source word for word. This may be confusing for readers, seeing as Texas Instruments and Samsung have long since settled this matter.
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change the name of "Royal Dutch Shell" to "Shell plc" in the "Major Clients" section since Shell is no longer a Dutch company and such can no longer use the moniker "Royal" since that belongs in a certain criteria of Dutch companies (exist for longer than 100 years and be a dutch national company, and it has not yet been crown a british royal company). Someren123 (talk) 16:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We recently updated MOS:KO to include MOS:KO-DATE. This asks for MDY date format (e.g. August 15, 1945) and not DMY format (e.g. 15 August 1945) for South Korea–related articles. As this article is pretty major and high-traffic, I wanted to ask for approval before the change is made. I'll give it a week or so before going ahead with it. seefooddiet (talk) 04:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't feel authorized to dispense approval, but I see no reason to oppose the conversion. If there's an MOS:KO it's more attuned to Korean customs and appropriate usages than I am. Wait for others' input, certainly, but AFAIAC, go for it. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits)12:48, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]