Talk:Secession of Panama from Colombia
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
USS Canada?
[edit]"Colombia then sent later a delegation of prominent politicians... this time aboard the United States ship USS Canada without reaching any consensus."
I find it unlikely that the United States would have a ship named after another country. Furthermore, the page it directs to (USS Canada NCC- 79114) sounds like a Star Trek fan site. I doubt that a USS Canada ever existed (and certainly not NCC-79114) and somebody should look into it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.204.51 (talk) 16:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
Agree USS Canada is higly unlikely. Additionally, "and also proposed making Panama City the capital of Colombia' is highly unlikely and not mentioned in the reference. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.254.237.113 (talk) 23:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
The Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships (http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/c2-list.htm) has no mention of a "USS Canada". The concept is laughable on it's face. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vdpittman (talk • contribs) 04:41, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Agree -- added "Dubious" tag. ~E 74.60.29.141 (talk) 06:39, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
I think this is the Esmeralda used: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esmeralda_(1791) Not this one: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_cruiser_Izumi Just need to change the link. I forgot how to do it. Spanish colony with a Spanish ship. I doubt a Japanese cruizer like that was used — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.48.20 (talk) 12:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
Separatist
[edit]Do we need to use pejorative terminology? Why not use "independence" which is politically neutral? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.77.196.187 (talk) 20:16, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
- Why not use the more precise (and neutral) technical term "secession"? SRamzy (talk) 21:22, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in History
- Start-Class vital articles in History
- Start-Class Colombia articles
- Top-importance Colombia articles
- WikiProject Colombia articles
- Start-Class politics articles
- Top-importance politics articles
- WikiProject Politics articles
- Start-Class Central America articles
- Latin America articles
- Start-Class Latin America articles
- Top-importance Latin America articles