Talk:Sigismund Ernuszt

Sigismund Ernuszt has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 5, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Twofingered Typist, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 13 September 2016..Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

A fact from Sigismund Ernuszt appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 May 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Sigismund Ernuszt, Bishop of Pécs, was accused of embezzlement in 1496, and murdered for his wealth in 1505?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sigismund Ernuszt.

Wikipedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Sigismund Ernuszt/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 04:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a review. Wizardman 04:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot I had any reviews tagged, sorry about that; will do in the next day or so. Wizardman 16:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Man I'm falling down on the job this month. Anyway, here's what I found:

"Ludovico Carbone who was one of his professors wrote a book about Matthias Corvinus in the form of a dialogue with Ernuszt." could this be reworded? right now it doesn't feel like it fits with the paragraph, and it took me several reads to get what it was trying to say. (if nothing else it needs commas added)
"Vladislaus Jagiellon was elected king on 15 July.[19] Ernuszt attended his coronation in Székesfehérvár in September." Combining these two sentences would make for better readability.
"The accounts cover the period between 1 February 1494, and 31 December 1495." rm comma
I'm not sure if there's an easy fix, but the prose at times does feel choppy, like it's jumping from fact to fact rather than flowing. With a biography from centuries ago the lack of information makes it difficult so I won't keep it from GA status solely for that reason, but I would like to see some fine-tuning, namely in the earlier sections, before I pass it.

I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 03:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I hope I fixed the above issues. I will also try to modify the text during the weekend. Borsoka (talk) 13:45, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wizardman, I would be grateful if you could continue your review, because I will not be able to address your concerns for a couple of days after 15th March. Thank you for your work. Borsoka (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Will check now. Sorry for the delay, not sure what's been going on with me lately; usually I'm the one yelling at other reviewers to get a move on. Wizardman 21:20, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass this as a GA. Wizardman 22:19, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your support. Have a nice week. Borsoka (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]