Talk:Somerton Man
![]() | This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Somerton Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 12 months ![]() |
![]() | Somerton Man was a History good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 1, 2012, December 1, 2013, December 1, 2015, and December 1, 2018. | ||||||||||||
Current status: Former good article nominee |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:
|
![]() | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
![]() | This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
"Tamam Shud" in the Bible: A Link to John 19:30 in the Somerton Man Case
[edit]The phrase "Tamam Shud," meaning "It is finished" in Persian, relates to John 19:30 in the Bible. The complete verse states, "When he had received the drink, Jesus said, 'It is finished' " (“Tamam Shud”), marking the end of his mission before his death.
In the context of the crucifixion, Jesus was offered vinegar (or sour wine) to drink as he hung on the cross. In John 19:28-30, the passage reads:
19:28 Later, knowing that everything had now been finished, and so that Scripture would be fulfilled, Jesus said, 'I am thirsty.'
19:29 A jar of wine vinegar was there, so they soaked a sponge in it, put the sponge on a stalk of the hyssop plant, and lifted it to Jesus' lips.
19:30 When he had received the drink, Jesus said, 'It is finished.' With that, he bowed his head and gave up his spirit.
In Persian Contemporary Bible (PCB), John 19:30 reads:
وقتی عیسی چشید، فرمود: «تمام شد!» و سر خود را پایین انداخت و روح خود را تسلیم کرد.
Vaghti 'Isa cheshid, farmud: "Tamam shud!" va sar khod ra payin andakht va rooh khod ra tasleem kard.
Is there a possible connection between "Tamam Shud" and John 19:30 in the Somerton Man case? 2001:9E8:198C:4600:28A2:BE94:3B57:1278 (talk) 12:14, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
- The phrase is used at the end of the FitzGerald translation of the Rubaiyat, a scrap of which was found in the Somerton Man's pocket. I wouldn't know whether the phrase is typically used to mark the end of works of Persian literature and the resemblance to John 19:30 is purely coincidental, or whether FitzGerald was perhaps indirectly referencing the Gospel of John, but I'm sure some other Wikipedian can enlighten us. Muzilon (talk) 21:09, 9 October 2024 (UTC)
"Attempt to decode"
[edit]I know exactly what that fragment of "coded" letters means. Not the individual letters, of course not. But at a higher level. And yes, fully aware that that makes me sound like any number of whack jobs. To whom should I pass on my "theory"? This place right here on Wikipedia doesnt seem like the right one. 2001:8003:E40F:9601:58A5:75DA:4526:F50E (talk) 02:48, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- We are not interested in what you claim to believe. We want your sources. If they are independent secondary sources, we may consider using them, so please provide them right here. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 02:55, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- You could contact the Australian police who might be interested. Also, there are some cryptography websites out there like [1]https://ciphermysteries.com/ or [2]https://scienceblogs.de/klausis-krypto-kolumne/ whose authors could listen to you, or if you think a scientific article is warranted, Cryptologia magazine might be your best bet. ([3]) --Syzygy (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
DOB in Infobox?
[edit]The Infobox now gives an exact DOB of 16-Nov-1905, which is apparently Carl Webb's birthday. Is it really appropriate to give this date if it's "unconfirmed" that Carl Webb is the Somerton Man? Muzilon (talk) 22:49, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. That's just a little too presumptuous. It should be removed. HiLo48 (talk) 22:59, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Australian English
- Former good article nominees
- B-Class biography articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Adelaide articles
- High-importance Adelaide articles
- WikiProject Adelaide articles
- B-Class Australian crime articles
- High-importance Australian crime articles
- WikiProject Australian crime articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- B-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- B-Class Death articles
- Low-importance Death articles
- Pages in the Wikipedia Top 25 Report
- Wikipedia pages referenced by the press