This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Noticing the Etymology section is currently 7 paragraphs long, 6 of which are blockquoted from Biden's farewell address. While it is interesting to read his exact words, that's why we have the article for the address itself. In this article, it's probably better to briefly discuss it in 1 or 2, maybe 3 paragraphs, discussing it based on how reliable sources discuss his address. guninvalid (talk) 06:13, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Completely agree. I think it looks slightly longer because the official transcription uses really short paragraphs. Eisenhower's blockquote on the page military industrial complex includes 12 sentences but split among 3 paragraphs. This speech features 16 sentences (although 4 are very short, declarative statements) but split up among 8 paragraphs. I included the sentences in question as they cover what reliable sources frequently described as part of Biden's "tech-industrial complex". BootsED (talk) 20:31, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A phrase that "is typically used to describe Big Tech" can not have been coined two days ago. Because it wasn't. It's not hard to find earlier instances of the term being used ([1][2]). Its fine to say Biden was calling back to Eisenhowers speech, but he did not coin a new phrase. — jonas (talk) 17:16, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]