Jump to content

Talk:The Beginning of the End (Lost)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleThe Beginning of the End (Lost) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Good topic starThe Beginning of the End (Lost) is part of the Lost (season 4) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 24, 2010.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 3, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
August 1, 2008Featured topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 18, 2007.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the airdate of "The Beginning of the End", the fourth season premiere of the television series Lost, means that the season may be interrupted by the 2007 Writers Guild of America strike even if a settlement is reached?
Current status: Featured article

Jacob

[edit]

I was watching my Season III DVD (Best Christmas gift ever!). In the episode with Jacob - the volcanic ash (or whatever it is) surrounding his shack could be to keep Jacob in. I don't know why I was assuming it was to keep people out but in re-watching it he is asking for help. What if Jacob represents "Good" and Ben represents "Evil". Does Jacob need help because Ben has him trapped in the circle? Ben was so agitated that Locke could hear Jacob he shot him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.213.198.197 (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do note that, when Hurley stumbled upon the cabin, he too could see the figure (Jacob) in the rocking chair. --Vi Veri Vici (talk) 04:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Look again. That was Christian Shepherd. Maybe in the form of some manifestation of Jacob, but the figure was definitely Christian, and definitely different from the image of Jacob seen previously. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.151.42.134 (talk) 18:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This really is not the place for this discussion. For thing this isn't even the page for the episode you are referring to which can be found at The Man Behind the Curtain. Furthermore, these talk pages are for discussing ways to improve the articles; they are not a forum for discussing possible answers to the plots of TV shows. —bse3 (talk • contribs • count • logs) 20:43, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Can someone please remove the "Christian Shepherd in a rocking chair" reference in the text. It is just someones opinion. All you can really see is a shadow. 79.103.144.171 (talk) 00:52, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It is not an opinion. If you freezeframe and brighten it, you will see.[1] Additionally, John Terry is listed in the credits, but appears nowhere else in the episode. –thedemonhog talk • edits 01:16, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Abbadon

[edit]

The supposed attorney's name is Abbadon. Do any of you think it is worthwhile mentioning that the hebrew word in fact means 'destruction' and in some contexts 'hell'? Or am I just looking for things that are not there? Chelman (talk) 21:56, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

[edit]

It seems to me that the reception section of this article is biased towards stating only the positive reviews. As per Wikipedia's policy, some of the negative reviews should also be listed for a neutral point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Da rulz07 (talk • contribs) 12:18, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are two reasons why this section may appear to not be neutral. First of all, I have not finished writing it (expect it to be done by Thursday). Secondly, the episode has been universally acclaimed. I am not picking through what critics said; I have recorded all reviews that I have found thus far. If you can fins a negative review from someone who gets paid to write (i.e. not fan blog), please tell me about it. –thedemonhog talk • edits 15:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some comments

[edit]

Just looked over the article - after seeing the episode last week (a week after the US) and my computer having been down the last two weeks - with a few comments, considering that in the future this may be nommed for good or featured status by thedemonhog (or maybe someone else!). Anyway.

  • In Reception, it's mentioned that "The San Francisco Chronicle "loved" the episode" and later "E! also loved "The Beginning of the End"". How subjective is the word love, and does it need to be quoted?
  • Does "the original 62-minute television broadcast" refer to the one-hour timeslot it took up? If so, the fact it was 2 minutes over the hour seems a little trivial and not worth mentioning.
  • I see above the neutrality of the article seems to have been contested. I don't believe the article is unneutral but I think it is leaning a little on the biased side - if that makes sense. True, I haven't personally come across a bad review either but to me the Reception section just appears to be listing off positive reviews after extracting the good comments out of them. The response has been entirely positive, sure, but if it's already mentioned is it really necessary to have two paragraphs wholly consisting of reviewers' comments? I just counted 15 different publications quoted, which seems far too much to support just one side of the argument. If one paragraph entailed positive reviews and another negative, that would be fine (IMO), but if it's already mentioned that nothing bad has been said, it just isn't necessary to list off so many good reviews.
    • I already [neutralised?] the statements "most - if not all - media attention was positive", which to me seemed like vague/uncited bias, and the statement that the episode was "only the 15th most watched show of the night" in Australia (as if we were expecting more viewers! - Lost is a bit dead over here).

So that's my two cents (I saved a few Australian 2-cent coins from back in the day - sorry, terrible humour) if it's worth anything. Overall it is a well-written article, a pat on the back to everyone who's given up their Friday nights for a good cause. ;) •97198 talk 07:23, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and what is reference #1 actually supporting? It's a photo of Claire but it's stuck after the opening sentence. •97198 talk 07:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Glad to have you back. I was wondering where you were. Both mentions of love, the Claire photo link and the 62-minute mention. The reception section is split into two paragraphs. The first features reviews from newspaper critics and the second has reviews from online publications. How did I decide which reviews to put in the first paragraph? I went to the list of 100 most read American newspapers in 2007. I started at #1 (USA Today) and went to #15 (The Star-Ledger). A few nespapers did not comment on the episode so they are not mentioned. I also happened to have Pittsburgh Post-Gazette and Associated Press reviews handy so I added them to the article, as well. I was actually going to keep going down the list and add reviews, but instead, I will go down the list (starting at #16) and search for a negative comment. –thedemonhog talk • edits 00:18, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Good to be back! And yeah, I get the Reception bit now. A good idea to sift through to most-read papers first! And don't kill yourself looking for some bad words - I suppose if everyone liked it then everyone liked it! •97198 talk 03:44, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Writing on Charlie's hand

[edit]

I just noticed that in the scene where Hurley sits in the interrogation room and Charlie appears in the water, he's got "they need you" written on his hand. It's not really mentioned in the text until the next scenes so I thought someone could include it. A reference to this is included in Wikipedia articles on Charlie and Hugo, so I thought this would be a good place to put it as well. Karafior (talk) 01:17, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You could have added this yourself because anyone can edit the encyclopedia, but I have added it to the production section. –thedemonhog talk • edits 06:33, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Monaghan

[edit]

Technically, Dominic Monaghan was starring in this episode, not guest starring. He conserved his "starring" status from the previous seasons, and only ceased to be credited as starring as from episode 4.02. I'm not sure how to indicate this in the article, though. Aridd (talk) 14:46, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Guest stars

[edit]

The guest stars in the infobox need to have their characters listed. Ophois (talk) 16:43, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Locke

[edit]

Ben shoots Locke in the stomach in one of the last episodes of season 3 and is just about to shoot himself when Walt appears. In the season 3 finale he is still injured and walks gingerly but throughout this episode he is completely healed. I know The Island has some sort of healing ability but this all happened in the same 24 hours. The island doesn't usually heal so quickly and even if he had healed he would still be covered in blood, have a hole in his shirt etc. Is this worth mentioning or is it revealed in a later episode? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.26.93.13 (talk) 23:19, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Easter Eggs

[edit]

not sure if it's original research or not, but in the production section it mentions easter eggs referencing the mythology of Lost. When Jack and Hurley play Horse, they stop after "HO". I counted out the letters numerically, and H is the 8th letter of the Alphabet, O the 15th. Another reference to the numbers, since they are even in sequence. I could add it, but I'm not sure if it's considered original research, since I don't think it's mentioned anywhere else, and not directly noted in the episode. 75.158.132.201 (talk) 17:35, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Sentence

[edit]

The first sentence in the article currently reads "[ABC's] television drama series Lost," but the version on the main page of Wikipedia today (in the featured article box) says "[ABC's] drama television series Lost," which is rather awkward. If someone knows how to change the version on the main page for today's visitors, it might be a good idea. 131.158.237.205 (talk) 14:56, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's all manually written. Any admin could fix this. --84.50.229.52 (talk) 15:14, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Pie

[edit]

someone likes pie, i guess.

Yes, but it's "clean now" TbhotchTalk C. 20:57, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on The Beginning of the End (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Beginning of the End (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:23, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on The Beginning of the End (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Beginning of the End (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Beginning_of_the_End_(Lost)&oldid=1201601053"