Talk:Type signature

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as High-importance).

Merge proposal

I support merging Method signature into this page (proposed in November 2008) because a method signature is a category of type signature and is not important enough to warrant its own page. If no one objects, I will merge them. dmyersturnbull ⇒ talk 02:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what about Signature (computer science)? Alksentrs (talk) 18:18, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support merging Signature (computer science) into this page. Mainly because it is a terrible article. --Specrat (talk) 02:31, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please, merge all. They seem to refer to the same topic. --Pnm (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would be happy to see someone merge these articles and remove the hand-holding advice oriented towards computer science undergraduates. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.237.100.119 (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please merge all. Sae1962 (talk) 14:05, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Function type?

Function type redirects to this article. What is function type? --Abdull (talk) 19:20, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Citation work is needed

The citations included each only cover a specific language, yet we somehow have 8 languages covered in this article. I believe we need a citation per language or a citation that covers multiple languages. Additionally, the source for C#, based on my reading, does not seem to support the article. The Java source is from Dotdash, and I know there are better sources for the Java language than that. I am planning on working on the sources at a later date. Gsquaredxc (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]