Talk:Ujjal Dosanjh

Ujjal Dosanjh was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 11, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
December 13, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Canada: British Columbia / Politics Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Organized Labour Mid‑importance

	Organized Labour portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Punjab Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Infobox

Why doesn't it show Dosanjh's successor as Premier? GoodDay (talk) 16:40, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There was a syntax error. nat.utoronto 17:14, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okie Dokie, thanks. GoodDay (talk) 17:20, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Election Sign

How about using this picture in the article? Hekerui (talk) 11:35, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, that looks good. Can you upload it or do you have to contact the creator first? maclean 15:54, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's properly licensed, I will simply add it. Hekerui (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Protection

I'm not a Wikipedian, don't know how to do this, but you guys might want to semi-protect this article. This guy was just interviewed by Stephen Colbert and I'd be a little surprised if you didn't see some Indian caste-system vandalism over the next few days. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.157.70.32 (talk) 04:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ਸਾਲਾ ਕੁਤਾ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਏਜੰਟ

ਸਾਲਾ ਕੁਤਾ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਏਜੰਟ, which redirects here, has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 February 7#ਸਾਲਾ ਕੁਤਾ ਹਿੰਦੁਸਤਾਨੀ ਏਜੰਟ. Your comments would be most welcome there. Thryduulf (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced controversy

I removed unsourced information on a controversy; per WP:BLP, negative information about living individuals needs reliable sources. The removed accusation can be seen here.[1]. -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Error in article

I noticed there was an error relating to the dates of birth in the article. The first paragraph states that he was born in 1947, while the personal detail box lists his year of birth at 1946. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paul Renée Lafayette (talk • contribs) 16:17, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:

There's uncited inforamtion, particularily in the parade section.
The article does not give any post-2010 inforamtion, after his defeat.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Ujjal Dosanjh

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's uncited information, particularly in the "Vaisakhi Parade controversy" section. The article also does not give any post-2010 information on this BLP. Z1720 (talk) 03:06, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.