Talk:White-bellied imperial pigeon
Appearance
White-bellied imperial pigeon has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 4, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
[edit]This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 20:56, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:White-bellied imperial pigeon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jens Lallensack (talk · contribs) 22:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Hello again, reading … --Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Ref 3, the first description, lacks the author. Also, p. 197 is wrong, I think it should be p. 1072. Please change the link so that it points directly to that page.
- Redirects for the other common names, as well as for Hemiphaga forsteni, to this article?
- When was it moved into the genus Ducula, and by whom, and why?
- but the population on Sula – Sulawesi? And link?
- Might be worth to include this as a weblink, which has sound clips of the call: [1] --Jens Lallensack (talk) 23:09, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
- Jens Lallensack, I've addressed all of your concerns. AryKun (talk) 14:38, 4 January 2022 (UTC)