Talk:Winter Spring Summer or Fall

Winter Spring Summer or Fall is currently a Film good article nominee. Nominated by M. Billoo at 21:41, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: 2024 film by Tiffany Paulsen

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Help: more info RS?

Hi all. There has been some information that I have found regarding this film and I want to know if they meet WP:RS and WP:N:

Lakeshore Records as record label for the soundtrack (as per their official website)
Tracklist and personnel as per the Original Motion Picture Soundtrack available to stream
Evangiline's music video on YouTube
Some security issues when fans recognized them during filming, after the release of Wednesday (See the transcript on YouTube)
Crew member got ill (See the transcript on YouTube)
Ortega herself was looking for this kind of genre, and she had been Paulsen's first and dream choice for this role (See the transcript on YouTube)
Release got delayed due to some allegations against Percy White Hynes, which he denied
One of the sources that I have linked states that this had been a little-known film of Ortega, means no proper marketing campaign...?
Box Office Mojo giving theatrical gross from one area only
Mention the term "Premium video on demand"

Furthermore, I have run some wiki-transcripts here in this page, they say that Forbes isn't a reliable source, is it correct? Although, I can see it requires subscription. Also, should the article needs to be expanded to 10x to qualify for WP:GA/WP:FA? I assume there are points here that can be featured on "WP:DYK" since I can see that Jenna Ortega's article is a GA:

Wednesday pair reunion
Filming took place right around Wednesday's release
Jenna Ortega as an executive producer
Ortega's first romantic role

Although this is just a new film, with not so good critical reception, and yet to be nominated in any awards, can someone please help or guide to expand the article? To the notice, I used to be an active contributor on film articles and had previously (co-)contributed on GAs like Jungle Cruise, Olaf's Frozen Adventure, and Dear Zindagi. Thank you! M. Billoo 20:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "transcript", M.Billoo2000, I think you mean what I'd call "interview". Interviews and Youtube are both problematic as sources. For interviews, see this; for Youtube, see this. For Forbes, see this. I don't know what you mean by "wiki-transcript", and the history of this (talk) page is uneventful. I think you've conflated GA eligibility with DYK eligibility; anyway, a considerable and/or rapid expansion isn't necessary to qualify an article as either "Good" or "Featured". -- Hoary (talk) 22:22, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Hoary: Thank you for your response.

Yes, I have studied policied like ELP and IV, and that's why I was concerned upon finding more info.
"Transcript" meant the subtitle part from any YT video (interviews in this case), which can also be copied in text form.
Wiki-~~transcript~~ tools: User:Shubinator/DYKcheck.js, User:Headbomb/unreliable.js (Sorry)
Sorry, it might have created confusion, but I am still interested to contribute if this article can any time get up to any of DYK, GA, or FA.

M. Billoo 22:42, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Went through RSP as well. M. Billoo 22:58, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know nothing about the film aside from what I read in the article; but what I read in the article doesn't suggest that the film is material for an FA. In order for the article to qualify for DYK, you (or somebody, or some people) would have to bulk it up considerably, and quickly (and well, of course). I think that it's already too long for such weight gain to be a realistic goal. Aiming for GA seems far more sensible. In your place, I'd first look for newspaper/magazine reviews of the film. Good luck! -- Hoary (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]