This template is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
I wonder if it would be worth adding the article Shy Tory factor to the see also section as I have done with Template:1992 United Kingdom general election? The 2015 election is covered in about the same detail as the 1992 election, but the difference is the article states that despite claims that the shy Tory factor had occurred again, the British Polling Council report into why the polls had seemingly been wrong concluded that the shy Tory factor did not explain the polling error/result of the election. I am inclined to add it as it was discussed in the context of the election, but would be grateful for other editors' thoughts before doing so. Dunarc (talk) 22:35, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
