This template is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
This template is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the template attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic
Discussion on a user page duplicated here:
Telling readers that a group of articles called "ThinkCentre" has an article line called "ThinkCentre" in it conveys no information whatsoever. What is it? Some of the lines mix laptops with other form factors, so perhaps splitting into "Desktop" and "other" might makes sense, so I will do that. But otherwise it seems redundant and wasteful. Especially if someone is browsing the article on a smart phone for example, every bit of screen area matters and should convey information instead of just take up space. And why hide the Lenovo 3000 and Lenovo Skylight? If they are not notable then let's delete the article instead of hiding it. W Nowicki (talk) 16:52, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the clarification, Nowicki. I believe I understand your point better now. It makes sense that brand names not be used for grouping, since users aren't likely to know much about the products and product names when they see them on Wikipedia. With the categorization of products, like I said, I was aiming to group them into something that accommodates future updates. As an alternative, can they be grouped as Enterprise/Corporate and Consumer machines?
If you look at the ThinkPads and ThinkCentres, they're aimed at business users. The other product lines (IdeaPad, IdeaCentre, Essential Laptops and Essential Desktops) are all Consumer. So a grouping like Corporate Desktops, Corporate Laptops, Consumer Laptops and Consumer Desktops (or some variant of that) might work better. Let me know if this sounds good and I'll update the template accordingly.
To folow up, yes, that is what I was thinking. Use terms that are in normal English and it much more likely to mean something to general readers. W Nowicki (talk) 17:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
