User:BrightStarSky
stuff
|
Tip of the day...
 When to use subpages
A subpage is a page that is stored "under" another page, and includes the parent page's name in its title, followed by "/" and the subpage's name. For example, User:Eloquence/Favorite Wikipedia quotes. When you visit a subpage, you will see a backlink (aka breadcrumb) near the top of the page back to the parent page. Subpages can be useful for organizing and archiving project content, and for creating workspace under a user account. On a parent page, you can create a link to one of its subpages by typing Articles don't have subpages. That is, subpages are not enabled in the article namespace, because many articles might qualify as subtopics of more than one topic. Instead, follow article naming conventions and include links to related subjects in the text. For the subtopic structure of subjects, see Portal:Contents/Outlines. – – Read more: To add this auto-updating template to your user page, use
{{tip of the day}} |
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Resilient Barnstar |
| Thanks for your well referenced updates. You do a great job here! Anir1uph | talk | contrib 05:16, 2 August 2012 (UTC) |
A Barnstar For You
[edit]
|
The Resilient Barnstar | |
| You're doing wonderfully. My deepest respect to you for your resilience. You have become a productive editor, and a real asset to the project. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC) |
and you deserve this:
|
The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar |
| For making 8,428 edits, 99.09% of which were to the mainspace. Very, very few editors can claim such a high percentage. You are a most valued editor. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2012 (UTC) |
John Mooney's Page
[edit]Hi,
I read an article in the Economist recently that had a bit in about John Mooney, and when I looked at his page on Wikipedia I noticed that you had made a lot of edits to the page, so as someone who has an interest in him, I thought I;d ask your advice before updating his page. Basically, given his statements on his past troubles with mental health, I was wondering whether it was worth mentioning. My perspective is that I think that to have been so open is a very courageous thing, and I think he deserves credit for doing so, especially in the light of cricket's long-standing problems in that area. But I'm concerned that in mentioning it in some depth on his page, might seem like oblique criticism, which is the opposite of what I intend.
I'm happy to do the work, but I was just looking for someone else's perspective. Have you any thoughts?