Thank you for the edits on the Tring Reservoirs, I cringe to look at the work I did back then! I must have started typing with only half a brain engaged.
I honor you for all of the work you have done for Wikipedia. You rock!! Bobdog54 (talk) 21:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
The Special Barnstar
I hereby award you this special barnstar for this edit, clearing up a factual error with a well cited, well written and timely addition to the article after a key error was pointed out in popular culture. Thank you for your diligence and quick work to make Wikipedia more reliable. Nutiketaiel (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the barnstar and for all of the work that you do around here. I just examined your list and noticed this glaring omission. —David Levy 01:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
Thanks for your friendly response to the new editor who posted a request for help at Wikipedia talk:Citing sources. You solved her immediate problem and simultaneously gave her an example of how to format sources for the future. Wikipedia needs more people like you. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
The Barnstar of Diligence
For your involvement, diligence and dedication in participating with every level of disambiguation, and for tackling the toughest of problems with a careful eye.
Hope to see you back soon. All the best, France3470(talk) 15:33, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
For moving a page many others had passed over. --xensyriaT 16:24, 17 April 2012 (UTC)
The Teamwork Barnstar
For all your work improving disambiguations, especially the ones I make! Jokestress (talk) 18:29, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
The Guidance Barnstar
For all your guidance and good advice, to myself and others, concerning disambiguation and other matters. ShelfSkewedTalk 05:49, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
The Invisible Barnstar
For all the underappreciated work you do, thanks. PRB88 (T) 19:18, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
JHunterJ is awarded this Tireless Contributor Barnstar for continually adding thoughtful discussion to disambiguation discussions. It is a pleasure to work with you! -- Natalya 00:49, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
勤労バーンスター
I dropped by your user page on my way to give you a barnstar for your work with the dab project's talk pages, and I noticed that you have a Japanese katakana transliteration of "Hunter" there. I just thought I'd take the occasion to let you know that the usual transliteration would be ハンター rather than フンター. フ is technically the correct character for "Hu", but only when that's pronounced as in "who". If you feel like looking at the Japanese Wikipedia, you can verify this by looking at, say, ホリー・ハンター (Holly Hunter). Happy hunting! Dekimasuよ! 12:55, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
The Admin's Barnstar
For persistence in assuring that Wikipedia be free of partial title match lists, and for the many other substantial contributions you have made to Wikipedia over the years, I award you this barnstar. Neelix (talk) 20:59, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
The Working Man's Barnstar
You do great work. (I put the pipe in there on purpose. Hee hee.) I bow. Keeper | 76 16:06, 12 December 2007 (UTC)
19 August 2020 Move review, BarrelProof's disagreement with my close on Crotalus concolor, procedural close incorrectly called an overturn after my suggestion to use a new RM was followed
Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2012 November 19, regarding Apteva's 4-RM return to hyphen/endash disruption, which corresponds to the self-subscribed 30-day avoidance of the MOS in the above AN/I
This is a Wikipediauser page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JHunterJ.
One of the most common methods used by WikiProject contributors to monitor and prioritize their work is that of assessing the articles within their scope. The de facto standard for these assessments is the Version 1.0 Editorial Team'sassessment scale (shown below).
– The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been reviewed by impartial reviewers from this WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class.
– The article is substantial, but is still missing important content or contains much irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup.
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
