Jump to content

User talk:2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm E6400. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kavita Krishnamurti have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. E6400 (talk) 19:33, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Vacuum cleaner, you may be blocked from editing. Schazjmd (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I would recommend reading the above. In encyclopedias, there are proper capitalization conventions to follow. Usually, there is no need to capitalize every word in a sentence. E6400 (talk) 19:35, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What are you talking about? Since when did I use improper capitalization? 2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762 (talk) 19:40, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is regarding your last edit, in which you inserted the following into an article:
"So Many Albums Many Films Songs Many Private Album Songs Many Islamic Qawwali & Songs Not Release That Why Not Be A List Of Songs In Wikipedia."
1. This is an opinion and belongs on the talk page, not on the article itself.
2. Per standard English mechanics conventions, only "Islamic", "Qawwali", and "Wikipedia" would be capitalized, not every word in the sentence.
I hope this helps. E6400 (talk) 19:44, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I was just trolling an admin. That was me reverting his reversions. 2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762 (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Trolling is unacceptable on Wikipedia. Editors are expected to remain civil and respectful toward each other. E6400 (talk) 19:47, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh really? Admins aren't being civil. 2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762 (talk) 19:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The admin should have left a proper edit summary but you are still expected to be a civil, constructive contributor. To resolve the issue I would suggest contacting the admin on his talk page. E6400 (talk) 19:50, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also noting that this will be my final communication regarding this issue, any further comments should be directed to the admin in question. E6400 (talk) 19:51, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I had admins on this site stalk and threaten me once. That was four years ago. What kind of Gestapo site are you running? 2601:940:C100:7AF0:88A:99AD:83CF:6762 (talk) 19:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for trolling and vandalism.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Giraffer (talk) 19:59, 13 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.