User talk:2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE

Triggering edit filters

We won't be sharing that sort of info with anonymous users, so please don't bother asking again. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 22:19, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just want to let you know that I was blocked for disruptive editing by Widr yesterday for a year, and it's not because of the protection requests. I spammed user talk pages with sock blocks and wanted editors to know that those accounts are sockpuppets of a known LTA. I then self-reverted the edits because I knew that the edits were not constructive. 331dot declined my unblock request because I made two of them. Since my IP changes every 24 hours, my access to my main talk page was denied. Is there a way for me to gain access to my main talk page? 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. If you ping me again, you will lose talk page access to this page as well. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:00, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies

I’d like to apologize for the vandalism I did. I’m sorry for tagging vandalism-only accounts as sockpuppets and will never do it again. I just wanted to know editors that those accounts are sockpuppets of a known LTA. Also, I’m editing less and less often when I joined 2 years ago, and made my 1000th edit today. I feel like I was showing WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:NOTHERE behavior. The last time I was blocked was in May, also for vandalism. My first five edits to mpox was also reverted because my edits were unsourced. Widr, the blocking admin, has unblocked 95 users. If he unblocked me, I would be number 96. I’m also thinking about submitting an unblock request, but my biggest fear that it’s 100% going to be declined. ! 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC1F:DA70:873E:DB77 (talk) 21:33, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for spamming talk pages of vandalism-only accounts with sock blocks. I immediately self-reverted the edits and knew I was going to be blocked. I just want editors to know that those accounts are sockpuppets of a known vandal and troll. I promise that I will never to this again and thought that I showed NOTHERE behavior. This block is not necessary because I self-reverted my vandalism and knew that my edits were unconstructive. This is just the first time I spammed user talk pages. If this request is declined, please change the block expiration date from 1/3/2026 to the original one, 10/8/2025. I’m also thinking about an IP block exemption, as I am interested in editing Wikipedia. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC1F:DA70:873E:DB77 (talk) 23:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Superseded by another request. 331dot (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It sounds to me like you have an account, because you speak of making your 1000th edit, an IPBE, and a NOTHERE block(the latter two of which is only done to accounts)- if you do, you need to request unblock from your account. The request will either be accepted or declined- we don't shorten blocks just because. 331dot (talk) 09:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block

I don’t have an account. I was just spamming user talk pages with sock blocks because those accounts are sockpuppets of a known LTA. Could you let Widr please change this from a disruptive editing block to a spamming block?2603:8080:D03:89D4:A553:EDCE:D5B4:6E9F (talk) 15:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming is disruptive editing, so there's no need to do that, the exact reason doens't matter. Is it possible for you to continue this at User talk:2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC1F:DA70:873E:DB77 even if your IP floats around? 331dot (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not possible because my IP changes every 24 hours. My access to User talk:2603:8080:D03:89D4:DC1F:DA70:873E:DB77 is already denied. On the unblock request, I said that I was showing NOTHERE behavior. I was wrong because that is only for newly created accounts. I was probably showing WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior because I spammed user talk pages with sock blocks. I also meant that I made my 1000th edit as this IP, not an account. I’ve never made an account before. I will never do such a thing like this again. I also don’t have an IP block exemption. After the block expires, I will transfer all the discussions to my main talk page. 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A553:EDCE:D5B4:6E9F (talk) 16:17, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I, I saw that you declined, so I guess I’ll have to wait. Reason is “superseded by another request”. So does that mean that you can only make one request, even though you can’t edit that one? I made the request here because my IP changed and I couldn’t edit the original one, I just had to revise my unblock reason. Sorry for making the new request. Is there a way to gain access to my main talk page? 2603:8080:D03:89D4:A553:EDCE:D5B4:6E9F (talk) 23:33, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Every time I see "This IP address has been blocked", I will cry because it's a long journey 2603:8080:D03:89D4:76E7:6E76:D599:24BE (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.