User talk:86.3.208.127

November 2021

Hello, I'm Blue Square Thing. Your recent edit(s) appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. See MOS:NICKNAME. Meet that or grow up. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC) Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:03, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

The three revert rule

Btw, you'd best read WP:3RR, just in case you've not come across it before. If you need to clarify anything about it, just ask, but I'm fairly certain you're in breach of it today and that's generally not a good thing. Blue Square Thing (talk) 22:25, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have read it and I've only done two revisions on the page. If you want to accuse me of something, try being right. You lot are so pompous with your tiny bit of power it's amazing.--86.3.208.127 (talk) 22:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not accusing you of anything - I was trying to help you avoid falling into a hole you really don't want to be in. It's always difficult to get that sort of thing across in writing of course, so I can understand how you might have misinterpreted what I wrote. I could have run straight to AVI or whatever, but I'd always prefer a note left first to let people who seem new what the problem might be.

Fwiw, your two other edits on the page over the last day would count as reverts under 3RR as they effectively undid a previous revert. That's the way that an admin would rule it I'm afraid, and 3RR is pretty much non-negotiable. Sorry, but it just is.

Now, I, for what it's worth, have fuck all power here - no more than any other editor who's been here for whatever the short length of time is to be given auto accept privileges. All you have to do is find something you're interested in and improve some articles. Dead easy. You'll pick the rest up along the way. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:18, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I, on the other hand, am an admin on another Wikipedia and we'd laugh this pomposity out of the room and tell you to get back to doing something useful, but sure, OK, bud. English Wikipedia is such a bunch of pseuds. --86.3.208.127 (talk) 23:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In which case you should know exactly how little power I have. Blue Square Thing (talk) 23:24, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, English Wikipedia has all the power. We don't even get to have our facts properly represented on our own country's page in the Wiki of one of our languages because y'all are too busy listening to our oppressors, but go off.

CS1 error on Oggy Oggy Oggy

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oggy Oggy Oggy, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:07, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Hello, I'm The Herald. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:37, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald: Sorry, is fixing errors not constructive? 86.3.208.127 (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't provide a source. I fixed Carew's article now (4 sources) 😀 Tewdar 17:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I need to provide a source to say Cornwall isn't in England. Just like I don't need a source to say France isn't in England. But thank you! 86.3.208.127 (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald: Excuse me? What right do you have to falsely declare the Cornish to be English? Do you know of some legal rejoinder of Cornwall to England that I don't? Because I have lots of evidence of it being separate. Or is evidence no good on Wikipedia now? Please provide evidence of the legal rejoinder of Kernow to England. 86.3.208.127 (talk) 16:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Philip Payton, you may be blocked from editing. Shaws username . talk . 16:39, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald: I'm literally not vandalising, I'm correcting these articles. If they are from Kernow, they are Cornish. 86.3.208.127 (talk) 16:43, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.