User talk:Abhimanyu Kapur

Adding about Milk Adulteration Cases in India and Supreme Court Orders

It is still mostly hidden that India largest producer of Milk and Milk products have largest adulterated market. Even in Supreme Court of India, government was questioned again and again ,where the then Health Minister confirmed 68% toxic that is milk made by chemicals in the country where it's first meal is milk. Thanx for reading and yes for 1.3 billion people I as a human and worldian requests for an article on this topic. Abhimanyu Kapur (talk) 14:47, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing

Please see this page. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:47, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Gwala Gaddi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Gwala Gaddi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 14:52, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohan Singh (AWBI) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohan Singh (AWBI) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohan Singh (AWBI), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 05:02, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mohan Singh (AWBI) (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mohan Singh (AWBI) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Mohan Singh (AWBI), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS (talk|c|em) 09:00, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm Utcursch. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Kalwar (caste), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. utcursch | talk 13:46, 4 September 2018 (UTC) I am unable to edit as GSS is removing my all rights whether to edit and my articles.[reply]

Adulteration in milk moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Adulteration in milk, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 16:52, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for improving Gwala Gaddi

I've worked a bit on your article Gwala Gaddi adding categories and references. Please format references using Cite web template. You might also want to fill in organization infobox and add more categories. Good luck with your edits! -- Bbarmadillo (talk) 06:06, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ruben Sarin. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. MBlaze Lightning 12:35, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Abhimanyu Kapur. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Someone dropped one of these on my page after I started editing and it was useful, so I thought it might be helpful for you, as you haven't got one from anyone yet. If you have any questions about editing, The Teahouse is a good place to ask. Curdle (talk) 16:29, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Curdle: .....thanks.....