User talk:Afstromen

Welcome!

Hi Afstromen! I noticed your contributions to Yashraj and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 07:23, 12 June 2024 (UTC)

September 2024

Hello, I'm Jeraxmoira. I noticed that you recently removed content from Anveshi Jain without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Stop removing the lede Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 11:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

You are right, I will surely explain what i improved in the article.

Afstromen (talk) 06:39, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Majhail film poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Majhail film poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:32, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Removal of maintenance tags

Hi, Afstromen! Thanks for creating Akaal: The Unconquered! You have removed the maintenance tags which were added as part of Wikipedia's New Page Patrol. You shouldn't remove such tags as they are added to help improve the article. Please click on When to remove this tag to know if issues have been addressed. I'd also like to tell that the plot summary you have added is incorrect. Please note that it's not necessary that a plot summary should have sources, so please don't add incorrect ones. You can take examples from other articles too, if you don't know whether it's correct or not. Cheers! _saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs^⚔ 08:55, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there,

I removed the tags after improving the article. I added all details with reliable sources. I added the plot getting details from a review on Indian Express article. I don’t think there is any issue with plot. Please mention why you removed plot?

Afstromen (talk) 10:25, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Afstromen! The reason I removed the plot is because it's incorrect. You have actually added the promotion summary of the film and not it's plot. For example see Brahmāstra: Part One – Shiva# Plot _saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs^⚔ 10:28, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

I think the tone is correct now and is right so I am removing 1 maintenance tag. _saluere, Ɔþʱʏɾɪʊs^⚔ 10:29, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

Edited comment on Maker's Asylum AfD

Hi @Afstromen, I edited one of your replies for Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Maker's_Asylum to close the strikethrough tag based on your second comment (it was striking out about 1/2 of the AfD log for May 16). Please update my edit if you need to! Anonrfjwhuikdzz (talk) 23:05, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Spinny (company)

Hello Afstromen, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Spinny (company), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spinny (company).

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Pppery}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

* Pppery * _{it has begun...} 14:39, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Draft: Ankush Shinde, IPS

Hi @afstromen, Thanks for reviewing the article Ankush Shinde, IPS which pertains to a living senior Indian Police Services officer of the Maharashtra cadre.

I noticed that you rejected the article with a short comment, so I wanted to inquire further and ask for your inputs.

Your comment states "No significant coverage in reliable sources. Some sources lead to an error."

-> Several other sources are available from sources such as Indian Express, Times of India, Sakal (a major newspaper in Maharashtra with a strong base of readership) among others. I will be able to easily replace the broken links. Thanks for pointing it out.

The officer is well-known across Maharashtra and has led as the Commissioner of Police for Pimpri Chinchwad (largest industrial automotive hub of India), Nashik (religious and wine hub), Solapur (industrial town) which are major urban centers in Maharashtra. The officer has directly impacted millions of peoples lives positively.

At the moment I have kept the write-up quite brief. Shall I go ahead and add all of the sources and make detailed updates? The officer has a 30 year long career in effective public service marked with TEDx speakership, President's Medal, interviews among other authentic coverage, so sources is not at all a problem to establish real world notability.

-> Secondly, I wanted to understand the objective basis as to why the Times of India, easily the biggest news publication in India, is not a reliable source. In case there is a strong bias, or favoritism that is visible in any of the publications, I'm more than happy to remove sources.

From what it appears, the articles refer to significant impactful events to the benefit of society that were led by Mr. Ankush Shinde in his capacity as a senior officer.

Thanks again for taking the time to review the article. Look forward to your inputs. Abhisennin (talk) 09:52, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Abhisennin,

Thank you for your contributions. At this time, the subject lacks in-depth coverage from reliable, independent sources. In order to establish notability and improve the article, please provide references to sources that offer significant and detailed information about the topic. Once additional reliable sources are added, I'd be happy to review the draft again.Afstromen (talk) 11:02, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Afstromen,

Thank you again for taking the time to review the draft article on IPS officer Ankush Shinde, and for raising the concern regarding notability and reliable sourcing.

I'd like to respectfully clarify a few points and request your further input to help strengthen the draft.

1) Clarification on Reliable Sources:

The article currently cites Times of India, Indian Express, Loksatta, Lokmat, Sakal, and TV9 Marathi — all recognized as independent, reliable, and widely cited sources in India, particularly for coverage of law enforcement and governance.

For example:

The Indian Express article on the 2018 Gadchiroli encounter (where 16 Maoists were neutralized) is one of the most cited reports on a major anti-insurgency operation in India.

Times of India coverage on the murder of a CEO in Nashik led to an investigative series featuring officer-led updates and strategic breakthroughs.

Loksatta and Sakal- among Maharashtra's most credible regional newspapers- have extensively covered community reforms and awards such as the Arun Bongirwar Public Service Award.

These sources are:

->Independent of each other

-> Covering different timeframes and events

-> Authored by a range of journalists with no apparent editorial coordination or agenda

If any specific source is flagged as not meeting reliability, I would be grateful for that clarification so I may replace or supplement it accordingly.

2) Context on In-depth Coverage for IPS Officers:

As an IPS officer, Mr. Shinde’s role is by nature operational, sensitive, and institutionally bound. Public servants in such roles do not engage in frequent interviews or media profiling, particularly in cases involving:

National security (e.g., Naxal operations), Juvenile crime reforms, VIP protection duties

Instead, their notability is evidenced through outcomes, leadership in critical postings, and sustained public impact - all of which are verifiably covered through multiple media reports and awards over a 30-year career.

Wikipedia’s own guidance notes:

“Routine coverage of the subject can establish notability when the coverage is extensive, reliable, and from independent sources.”

The draft aims to follow this guideline by building a structured timeline, citing over a dozen reliable articles, and focusing strictly on public service and impact - not personal details or promotional tone.

3) Comparative Precedents:

I’d also request a review of biographies of similarly positioned Indian civil servants, such as:

Sandeep Karnik (IPS)

Praveen Pardeshi (IAS)

Their articles are built on comparable depth of reporting and follow similar notability logic, relying on high-impact service milestones rather than celebrity-style coverage.

I would be happy to further improve the article by:

-Adding more citations (I am compiling 30+ verifiable sources)

-Linking specific projects or outcomes to each posting

-Ensuring all references are from independently verifiable sources

-Refining the content of the article

Thank you again for the guidance. I look forward to your suggestions on what additional improvements would help this article meet the notability threshold. Abhisennin (talk) 14:40, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Please understand that in order to establish notability on Wikipedia, the subject must be covered with significant depth in reliable, independent secondary sources. Upon reviewing the cited sources, it appears that they do not provide the level of in-depth coverage required to demonstrate notability under Wikipedia's general notability guideline (GNG).

Additionally, while disclosing a conflict of interest (COI) is appreciated and encouraged, it does not exempt edits from the requirement that all content must be verifiable and supported by reliable sources. Any unsourced or poorly sourced content should be removed in accordance with Wikipedia’s policies.

If you are referencing other articles that appear to cover similarly non-notable subjects, please note that the existence of those articles does not justify retaining this one. Articles that do not meet notability standards are subject to deletion through Wikipedia’s established deletion processes (such as Articles for Deletion (AfD)).Afstromen (talk) 04:40, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Draft: Nasha jurm aur gangsters film

Hi @afstromen, Thank for review the article Nasha jurm aur gangsters, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nasha_Jurm_Aur_Gangsters ) but i seems you not read and see the article reference, the movie is very popular and widely pan india release, it was in wikpedia before the movie release in 2023, the article was re-direct for lack of critic review in please see the discussion and issue why its re-directed ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nasha_Jurm_Aur_Gangsters ) but now i added the abp critic source now. and all source like Times of india, are notable as per wikipedia guidelines as per others film articles such as this film, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jo_Tera_Hai_Woh_Mera_Hai ). I addressing the issue of added the critic source. Please check and review it again. This film is a pan india release and it was in wikipedia from 2 years before its re-direct. Please see the history of the article. Thanks DivitNation (talk) 08:50, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Please read WP:NFILM. Afstromen (talk) 12:23, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

@Afstromen I have read it. I know what is Notability mean. The news sources already added. You please read- The general notability guideline states: "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list. Also this film article was from 2 year in wikipedia, I have solved the issue of critic response from a apb news. Please see critic response of the film. DivitNation (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

So please show me the significant coverage in reliable sources. Point your sources here. Afstromen (talk) 15:30, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

See Their are some articles which has reliable source regarding the article which address you well.

This one times of india source about the film- https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/action-thriller-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-gearing-up-for-release/articleshow/99174921.cms

Another Times of india source about the director who playing the lead role in the film. source: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bengali/movies/rupkumar-finally-fulfills-his-dream-of-playing-a-gangster/articleshow/100098330.cms

Another times of india movie releasing date proof: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/hindi/movie-details/nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters/movieshow/113492052.cms

This one abp news critic review by famous bollywood film reviewer Amit bhatia.

https://www.abplive.com/movie-review/entertainment/movie-review-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-review-rajkumar-patra-pan-india-movie-review-in-hindi-2942967

Those source are enough for an article general notability in wikipedia, although it was in wikipedia from 2 years as i mentioned previously. Thanks. DivitNation (talk) 15:59, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The Times of India is not considered a fully reliable source for establishing notability, and the only one source (ABP) is not enough for notability.Afstromen (talk) 16:17, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi there sir, i have checked out for some more source and i have found about a NDTV news source about the lead actor and director who worked in the film. https://ndtv.in/bollywood/nasha-jurm-and-gangster-actor-director-rocky-rupkumar-patra-inspiring-journey-6048179

and a zee news source of the producer and director of the film here- https://zeenews.india.com/hindi/entertainment/who-is-rajkumar-patra-struggle-story-career-films-upcoming-movie/2460342

Also see TV9 source: The film is in imdb trending film of the year- https://www.news9live.com/entertainment/bollywood/most-anticipated-indian-movies-shows-of-the-year-this-bengali-film-tops-the-list-2692479 (news9 like is a tv 9 news network)

The film is also announce in tv channels like zoom tv, 9 xm, but i can't provide tv telecast link.

Also here a bollywood product source: https://www.bollywoodproduct.com/media-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-hindi-film-16485

which source also use in this film article which published: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaila_(film) so i added. (note: this article also used a instagram link as ref which is not a news source, & many poor reference) you can crearly see my article is much more better than this one which is reviewd and published.

I added all those main source in the article in my draft.

Also please stated why Times of india is not a relible source as you mention. as i know most of film article has times of india source. for your kind informations pls see some of those film articles- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_S3 (It added Imdb as a reference source and very few poorly news sources)

checked this, i found it this so funny ref, but still in wikipedia- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowdy_Rocky (youtube & gaana is the relible source?) i can show you thousand of articles like this, my article is a tiger article from those. and we both know like this many articles still in wikipedia which don't have any reference but those are in wikipedia and no one objection with those.

We are here to make wikipedia better not for discourage each other. I think those are enogh for the article to be reliable. So please review my article sir. DivitNation (talk) 18:36, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

The NDTV and Zee News articles refer to the actor, not to the film itself. The remaining sources do not appear to meet WP:RS standards for reliable, independent coverage.

You’ve mentioned three films, but two of them appear to be non-notable and could be nominated for deletion under WP:NFILM. Afstromen (talk) 18:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

@afstromen Are you kidding me... In my draft those refers for as secondary source for the film as the actors are acted and directed. so whats wrong with it.?? you have discourage me again n again. and why times of india not a reliable source.? that i want to know from any admin. please tag any admin. and you said those articles will be deleted soon but my question is why those are reviewd and still in the wikipedia from years?? maybe the reviewer is blind or paid. i want to bring the reviewer of those articles why they publised it as those are don't have any sources. & I want those poorly sources articles deleted now. you have't tag for deletation also. are the reviewr are paid or have any connections with those articles?? i can show you 1000 of articles like that. will you deleted alll? and yes i will bring this matter in public. that wikipedia is look like corrupted or in childs hand. please bring those reviewer here. @ User:Manick22 @User:Significa_liberdade @User:Taabii - : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaila_(film)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romeo_S3

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rowdy_Rocky

why those no source articles are here?? and why my Article ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nasha_Jurm_Aur_Gangsters ) which is imdb most trending movie of the year us not reliable, when i give so many better sources. and also it was 2 years from wikipedia before release with times of india sources, its only redirect for no critic review but i have found it and solved the issue but you are saying times of india not reliable source.

please bring user @User:GrabUp who said it need critic review. please come. DivitNation (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I understand that you're feeling discouraged, and I’d like to clarify the reasoning behind the decision regarding your draft, as well as address your concerns in good faith.

The draft you submitted, Draft:Nasha Jurm Aur Gangsters, was declined because it does not currently demonstrate notability as defined by Wikipedia’s policies, specifically the guideline on films at WP:NFF. For a film to be included on Wikipedia, it must receive significant coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources. This coverage must go beyond simple announcements or listings and instead offer substantive commentary, such as in-depth reviews or critical discussions of the film's impact, production, or reception.

You referenced The Times of India as a source. While it is a well-known publication, the community has identified long-standing reliability issues. As summarized at WP:TIMESOFINDIA, most TOI articles related to films tend to be promotional, often republishing press releases or offering only basic, uncritical coverage. For that reason, TOI is generally not considered reliable for establishing notability for films, unless the article itself contains substantial original reporting or critical analysis which is rare in its film section.

You also mentioned IMDb and its trending status for the film. Please note that IMDb is a user-generated database and is therefore not considered a reliable source on Wikipedia for verifying content or establishing notability. Its rankings, user reviews, or popularity metrics cannot substitute for independent journalistic coverage. This is outlined in detail at WP:IMDb and WP:USERG.

Regarding the other film articles you brought up such as Shaila, Romeo S3, and Rowdy Rocky if you believe those articles do not meet Wikipedia’s notability requirements, you are welcome to nominate them for deletion through the appropriate community process at WP:AFD (Articles for Deletion). Please keep in mind, however, that the existence of articles that may not meet guidelines is not a valid reason to accept new drafts that also fall short. Wikipedia is constantly evolving, and past content does not set precedent for new inclusions. We’re all volunteers trying to improve the encyclopedia. Please avoid accusations like “paid editors” or “corruption.” If you have valid concerns, they can be raised at WP:ANI or WP:COIN. Afstromen (talk) 10:22, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@Afstromen Hi, i am too much confused for your statement, in other hand you said the times of india has notebility and other hand you said its not a relieble source, first make me clear that, so why so many film article has times of india news? give me proof why the source is not acceptable? as for my draft article please show me whats wrong in those times of india articles? is their anywhere written that is a promotional? first of all that draft article already on wikipedia from 2 years before the critic review. with the times of india sources. and i never said that take imdb as news source. never. i show you https://www.news9live.com/entertainment/bollywood/most-anticipated-indian-movies-shows-of-the-year-this-bengali-film-tops-the-list-2692479 this is a source from TV9 network. is a news source. which written here the film is on trending withs others films, i knwo i was in trending because of the news & this is not promotional as i know. and i have added actors secondery sources with zee news, NDTV, times of india and abp. those sources are enough to pass a film wikipedia. or you show me the proof this film is not notable or never happening. And the others articles why they are Wikipedia without critc review too far they dont have just good news publication. show me where written that times of india which is india's number one portal sources are not a reliable source.? please show where written ? DivitNation (talk) 14:58, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Two of the three articles you mentioned have not been reviewed. Not all articles have to go through the Articles for Creation process, but they will be reviewed by other experienced Wikipedians. In this case, bother Shaila (film) nor Romeo S3 are awaiting review while in Wikipedia's main space.

Beyond that, I'm confused about your question: "why those no source articles are here??" All three of the articles you referenced have sources. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Yes, @Significa liberdade, you’re right. I’ll take a closer look at the articles on these films shortly. If they do not appear to meet Wikipedia’s notability guidelines, I’ll consider nominating them for deletion through the AfD process. The user may not yet be fully familiar with Wikipedia notability guidelines, but I’m approaching the situation constructively and with a positive attitude.Afstromen (talk) 13:06, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Show me the sources? Which are? The instagram link or imdb or gaana or times of india source? Where this user @Afstromen is declared that times of india articles are not a reliable source. Which he declined my article. Where I said to see my draft article history. it was from wiki from 2 years before its re-direct by @User:Grabup for missing critic review.bt I found the abp review and added. But he not satisfied with it. What is happening here? In which rules and regulations you are maintaining? Its just a film article guys. Those films I poiting here there is no critic review or no news media articles. But still this are live in wikipedia from year so wht wrong with my film articles my articles have more sources. How? Its something cooking here. By the way I can show you 1000 of articles like this. Which are don't have reference bt reviewed. Please be frindly and give me chance to contribute more. We have to work hand to hand. DivitNation (talk) 14:41, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

I didn't say the sources were reliable. Your comment made it sound as if the articles were entirely unsourced, which is not the case.

Wikipedia is an imperfect encyclopedia with many bad articles, many of which were created a while ago. Wikipedia's guides for which subjects are eligible for standalone articles has changed. Furthermore, many articles for notable subjects exist without being up to our highest standards. As such, it has a lot of "bad" articles. Pointing to the fact that "bad" articles exist does not explain why your new article should exist. Rather, as was previously stated, it points to opportunities to remove existing articles.

To determine which subjects deserve articles, Wikipedia uses notability guidelines. For films, we use WP:NFILM. Many sources that have been discussed for reliability are listed at WP:RSP.

I know it can be confusing to have your draft article declined. However, instead of arguing that your draft is as good as some existing drafts, it would be better to explain how your draft meets Wikipedia's existing notability guidelines. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:09, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

@DivitNation Please note that arguing for the inclusion of an article without referring to Wikipedia’s notability and content guidelines is unlikely to be effective. Wikipedia requires that topics meet certain notability standards, particularly by having significant coverage in reliable, independent sources. If an article does not meet these criteria, it may be nominated for deletion and could be deleted following community consensus. Even if a non-notable article currently exists, it can still be nominated and removed once reviewed. Any editor who believes an article does not meet Wikipedia’s inclusion standards is welcome to initiate a deletion discussion. Afstromen (talk) 04:47, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Afstromen you said times of india is not a reliable source and not acceptable but its not written anywhere. you are decline my article cause its has 2 times of india news or its upto your mood ? you have nominated those 2 other film articles after i show you. i can do this whole day, i have said that i give you 1000 of articles and you nominate each articles? Why those are reviewed? thats my question. when instagram link & gaana in source. but see my article is a pure reliable with so many news. where i already stated my draft its on wikipedia from 2 years long. DivitNation (talk) 06:37, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade No brother, im not arguing, i don't love to do it. but when its comes to right & wrong i will argue till the end. its a free world and everybody have rights to speak for truth, a life of human is not matter where it's very much unpredictable so why we arguing for some little things. Now i come to topic where i said their are lots of bad articles are reviewed and still in wikipedia, First thing Here this reviewer user @afstromen said Times of india is not a reliable source, where is written? show me. or i will written in times of india wikipedia page that times of india articles are not reliable source as per wikipedia guidelines. they are like imdb or promotional. second come to my draft article, i have already give the statemnt many times but the reviewer are ignoring it, you please see- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Nasha_Jurm_Aur_Gangsters i checked its a very popular film in india, it was in wikipedia from 2 years, please see the history of the film, i have check bro you also edit this film in past. after the film release was redirect by @user:Grabup https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Nasha_Jurm_Aur_Gangsters where he stated no reliable critical reviews available. I also searched in Hindi using 'नशा जुर्म और गैंगस्टर्स' but found nothing. But i have found this critic review of abp here by amit bhatia- the film https://www.abplive.com/movie-review/entertainment/movie-review-nasha-jurm-aur-gangsters-review-rajkumar-patra-pan-india-movie-review-in-hindi-2942967 thats it! issue solved. this is a pan india movie & its have enough source to show notability. 2 times of india, one ndtv, one zee news as secondary sources and others sources. now the reviewer said times of india's source are not acceptable. now i said why? show me where its written otherwise he don't have to said that. I belive its have enough notability for a film. You can't ignore times of india articles. its totally not fair or tell him to show me where its written. thats it. DivitNation (talk) 06:31, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

Apologies if my use of "argue" came across incorrectly. I was using "argue" in the sense of trying to prove a specific point. I teach writing, and we often refer to the point an essay is trying to make as the essay's argument.

That said, Afstromen has already pointed you to WP:TIMESOFINDIA, which states, "TOI has sometimes had a poor reputation for fact-checking and its use should be evaluated with caution." The listing also states that TOI often publishes paid editorials (e.g., film promotion), which are unreliable.

If you had addressed the issues the previous reviewer left and would like further feedback from a different reviewer, you can submit it for review again. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:40, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade Okay bro. Yes I have addressed the issue. And I Resubmit it. Thanks DivitNation (talk) 06:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Draft: Dwarakh Raja ,

Hello Mr.Afstromen, Thanks for reviewing the draft. I understand you feel the articles submitted are insufficient. Can you please help and guide about kind of articles needed to submit and share me why those articles are insufficient if you don't mind? So that I won't take much time as it waste your time if i resubmit something same.

I will be waiting for your reply.

Thank you. Sabarish1996 (talk) 05:56, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

I have left a comment in the draft, please check. Afstromen (talk) 06:38, 27 June 2025 (UTC)