User talk:AlchemistOfJoy

Drop me a message, I will gladly read it!

Hello!

Fell free to make your post!--AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 13:41, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome...

Hello, AlchemistOfJoy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

One thing that I would like to point out is that it would be helpful to other editors if you remembered to fill in edit summaries for all of your edits.

Again, welcome! J04n(talk page) 22:57, 14 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Conscientiology

Category:Conscientiology, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 01:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Journal of Conscientiology

The article Journal of Conscientiology has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. No independent sources, not indexed in any selective database. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NJournals.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 15:00, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Journal of Conscientiology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Conscientiology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Conscientiology until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Journal of Conscientiology may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Congress of Projectiology and Conscientiology (ICPC)], at NY Academy of Medicine (May 2002).]</ref> First one is published as a special supplement to the normal issue and the second one is a
Host: ''Information about the 1st IAC Global Award for Scientific Contribution to Conscientiology (2nd Int. Symp. on Conscient. Research] (Oct 18, 2008 in Evoramonte)'', [http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/proceedings/47915650/presenting-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Planning to work on the superheavy elements' infoboxes, eh?

Thanks. It's been lonely there. Hope to see you around. ;-) Double sharp (talk) 14:56, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thermal Conductivity Edit

Regarding your edit, 'for' and not 'form' appears correct. The light scattering does not form/create small particles; rather it is scattering 'off' or 'for' small particles. Dmytro (talk) 03:14, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just changed 'form' to 'from', which fixes the article text. Dmytro (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Astrophotography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The Amateur Connection, The Roles of Photography in Professional Astronomy, Challenges and Changes]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Would you please translate the entry "pt:Críticas à Rede Globo" for the wiki-en? Thankfully. 177.182.54.27 (talk) 14:11, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there 177.182.54.27! Almost all the entries of the wiki-pt beginning with the word "Críticas" are merely constructionism and therefore against Wikipedia standards. I cannot translate a article like that. Thanks for the enquire! -- AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 14:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alchemist of JOy. Eu não perderia tempo com este pedido. Primeiro, o autor não apresenta nenhuma justificativa, mas pronto, não é o maior pecado. O pedido vem de um IP, geralmente este tipo de pedido vem de editores mais sérios. Mas também isto não é pecado. O que realmente me preocupa é que este pedido é a soma de tudo que editor algum dia contribuiu, como podem aqui. Para quem nunca nada fez por aqui, o que quer ele agora fazer com a tradução da página? Ou é algum espertinho que tem de fazer isso de trabalho de casa durante as férias e pensou que ia aqui encontrar um trouxa para fazer isso por ele? Deixou o pedido na página de 88 editores!!! E ainda por cima nem tem uma página de discussão para receber qualquer resposta. Na WP portuguesa também apareceu hoje do nada e fez isto Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Olá Rui Correia! Obrigado pela mensagem! Faz muito sentido isto que escreveste. Os motivos do IP são extremamente obscuros e mais que duvidosos. Temos que alertar os outros editores! Não podemos desfazer as edições dele por SAPAM? Talvez um bloqueio de 1 dia seja também adequado. Abraços!! --AlchemistOfJoy (talk) 16:48, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, AlchemistOfJoy. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlchemistOfJoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, AlchemistOfJoy. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]