Jump to content

User talk:Amigao

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2025

[edit]

Information icon Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Talk:Huawei: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. Qrstw talk contribs 18:48, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Amigao,
I see that you have reverted the content about Omnihuman in Bytedance stating that reference is FORBESCON. Is it ok if I change it with some other reputable site link. Emly Jones (talk) 08:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure and WP:RSP is a good reference for reliable sourcing. - Amigao (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ETAN

[edit]

With regard to this edit: would you care to explain to me what about Reuters makes it a deprecated source? Thank you. 199.88.91.66 (talk) 04:00, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you notice that NewsBlaze (see: WP:RSP) was the main source there? Amigao (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Amigao

[edit]

I don't mean to engage in edit war and violate the three-revert rule, I just edit so that everyone can understand. Besides, the information I have, came from the true article. Please understand me, Amigao. 14.177.68.68 (talk) 06:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's a lie: you did mean to engage in edit warring, because you went and continued doing it right after posting this. Remsense ‥  07:21, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Edit to contribute isn't called edit war. If you don't want me to contribute, then alright, I'll stop. 14.177.68.68 (talk) 08:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you re-read what Amigao initially posted. It explains what edit warring is and why people allow themselves sometimes to do it anyway. As is explicitly stressed, even if you are right, that is not an excuse to edit war. Remsense ‥  08:36, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I have read about edit war and WP:ONUS, but why you and Amigao has to revert? Did the informations I have, came from true article, not suitable? 14.177.68.68 (talk) 11:19, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New user adding social media fan war outcome Article Bai Jingting

[edit]

Hi admin, I'm not sure how reliable. User :Blueushsmile opened an account on 19 Feb 2025, added controversy statement in Bai Jingting. Fans fighting over bias screen presence is considered as controversy. Other brand related statements is also over exaggerated. Pls consider to have look into it SakuraSmart (talk) 20:06, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hi could you review the same. User: [Blueishsmile] 2weeks old, all edits are in this article, placing deprecated dead links, twitter based fanwar inappropriate controversy. Pls look into the same. SakuraSmart (talk) 03:11, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

IE Business School

[edit]

Hi again,

I understand your initial skepticism about my interest in editing the IE Business School page, and I’ve already replied to address those concerns. However, I’d appreciate it if you wouldn’t remove so much of the content I contributed. I’ve put significant effort into researching the school’s alumni and faculty, and every individual I added is listed on their own Wikipedia page as having attended or taught at IE. As I mentioned before, I’m still fairly new to the community, so perhaps I didn’t know how to properly cite that as a source, but I’m happy to correct it, if you would have just pointed it out instead of blankly deleting it without looking into it more closely.

My goal is not to spread lies on Wikipedia.

Best,

WHU2208


WHU2208 (talk) 20:18, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would recommend you review WP:BOOSTER and also WP:RS. All factual claims, especially those involving living persons, need to be backed up by WP:RS. - Amigao (talk) 20:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

[edit]

Information icon Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:Opinion polling in China, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Please don't overcategorize. Just because the current contents could fit in the narrower category, doesn't mean you should narrow it. SMasonGarrison 02:17, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted many of your changes where you moved pages from FOO in China to FOO in the People's Republic of China. SMasonGarrison 02:19, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi!:)

I reverted you're edit. China Copyright and Media is run by Rogier Creemers, an academic who works as an Assistant Professor. Moreover, the article is a translated version of the Work Regulation of the CCP Central Committee. I can, of course, refer directly to the Chinese one, but I felt in this instance it would be more correct because, well, most readers cannot read or speak Chinese, so if they check the source, they can at least read what's in it! TheUzbek (talk) 14:08, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TheUzbek, in that case, it would probably be useful to add in the original source to complement the translation on Wordpress. - Amigao (talk) 15:14, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I will try to make a more comprehensive edit outlining the Secretariat's role, functions and powers. I will do a better job with the referencing then :) TheUzbek (talk) 15:40, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Archive URL tool

[edit]

Hello, Amigao! I was wondering which WikiTool or script you use to add archive links to articles. It would be really helpful for my work refurbishing old articles. Thank you in advance! Yue🌙 23:36, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IABOT - Amigao (talk) 01:03, 23 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]