User talk:Ar1a1yan

November 2020

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Heba Aisha (talk) 20:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021

Hello, I'm Zoglophie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, P. V. Sindhu, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 🌌Zoglophie🌌 07:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I added the citation Ar1a1yan (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Harit Pradesh, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:51, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shiv Dev Joshi Title

The article Shiv Dev Joshi Title has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that the person in question is actually the "Prime Minister of Kumaon", other than a blog cited here, which is not enough to establish notability per WP:NBIO and WP:NPOL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —twotwofourtysix^{(My talk page and contributions)} 05:13, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Shiv Dev Joshi Title

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiv Dev Joshi Title

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shiv Dev Joshi Title, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Trickipaedia (talk) 10:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No offence if you yourself are the Rt. Hon. Prime Minister of the People's Republic of Kumaon.--Trickipaedia (talk) 10:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Shiv Dev Joshi Title

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Shiv Dev Joshi Title requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 21:35, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ethnic groups in Delhi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Code Pending (talk) 18:23, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

please check the source and edit the percent according to the source percentage is wrong

You are correct. I have self-reverted and restored your edit. Code Pending (talk) 18:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

I just came across this edit of yours from August. That kind of language simply doesn't belong in Wikipedia. It should've been reported then itself but you appear to have been lucky. Take utmost care not to repeat it. Hemanthah (talk) 17:14, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Debal moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Debal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 19:15, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that in this edit to Sial tribe, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 21:38, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in South Asian social groups. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— DaxServer (talk) 22:01, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi Ar1a1yan! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Karkota dynasty that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. RegentsPark (comment) 22:29, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I notice you've marked a large number of edits as minor that do not fit the definition of minor. Please read Help:Minor edit carefully. Better still, just don't use the minor edit checkbox. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:30, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok in future i will remember this. Ar1a1yan (talk) 07:52, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Doremon9087 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Doremon9087. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Trialpears (talk) 03:04, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

i am not getting that i am using this account only and providing sources and citations. And i never vandalise anything all my edits have sources please check again may be its a mistake and i check that account you are saying i am socket puppet of thats not my account.Please re check and unblock me. Thanks Ar1a1yan (talk) 12:53, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Adi Gaur

The article Adi Gaur has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article content is unverifiable due to lack of page numbers, many sources are unreliable due to age or irrelevant in the content they claim to support, and article was created by and only edited by disruptive caste editors who are now blocked.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Debal

Hello, Ar1a1yan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Debal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]