User talk:Winstace

This is Winstace's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Assignment Freelance (May 21)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Assignmentfreelance! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Assignmentfreelance/sandbox/Assignment Freelance

Hello, Assignmentfreelance. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Assignmentfreelance/sandbox/Assignment Freelance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kafou Group (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Linkedin.com and their own websites are not independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kafou Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:25, 1 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thanks, working on sources right now. Assignmentfreelance (talk) 06:57, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Kafou Group moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Kafou Group. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement, you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and it consists of machine-generated text. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Theroadislong (talk) 06:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

paid editing

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Assignmentfreelance, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Assignmentfreelance|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 06:58, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It's just a topic like any other, no affiliation no links no payment to me, I am trying to acknowledge that this company is doing great in helping and funding to the small health facilities like the Clinicy through MEVP available at: https://www.mevp.com/news/saudi-healthtech-startup-clinicy-secures-major-series-a-funding-and-celebrates-one-million-patients-served.

If that's not enough for a them to be a recognized facility, then I don't know what really is. Thank that's part of my story I won't edit the document anymore if you tell me not to. Otherwise I stand to be guided. Assignmentfreelance (talk) 09:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your username suggests that you take on assignments as a freelancer. You didn't pick this company at random to edit about. 331dot (talk) 09:54, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not true, as I said before, if the topic is not qualifying for Wikipedia, just let me know to drop the topic. I don't work for money or anything, I am trying to create contents for topics that are not made yet, My username is 4 years old, and I created it randomly, has nothing to do with the aforementioned "paid" notion. Thanks. Assignmentfreelance (talk) 10:00, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You claim to have personally created and personally own the copyright to the logo of Kafou Group. If you are not working for Kafou Group directly or indirectly, you must immediately without delay request deletion of the logo from Commons.

How did you obtain this image? 331dot (talk) 10:02, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I took image from a website and removed background to make it clearer, I thought that would make me the new owner of the image.Okay, let me rectify the image on the commons. Assignmentfreelance (talk) 10:05, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What you did would be akin to you taking a picture of the Mona Lisa and then selling copies claiming it is your personal work- an image of an image is not a way to get around copyright. You cannot just take images from the internet and use them here; you must show that the image was released with a copyright compatible with Wikipedia(this must be explicitly stated, it can't be assumed). With the Kothari image, it may be old enough that it is in the public domain depending on the laws of the country in which the image was produced(India?) so it may not need to be deleted, but you will also need to work to establish that the copyright is compatible.

Images are actually not relevant to the draft process. Images are an enhancement, not a requirement. In terms of drafts, images can wait until the draft is accepted, as the draft process only considers the text and sources.

My advice would be that, if your username isn't meant to indicate that you are a freelancer, that you change your username via Special:GlobalRenameRequest or WP:CHUS, because people who see your username are going to think your are a freelancer, especially if you edit about a current company or person. 331dot (talk) 10:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

True, I understand, I thought there is no way to edit it, I will edit it and remove pictures in the draft. I have made changes to that article by sourcing new independent sources that shous the existence of the topic and also how important it is. Thanks Assignmentfreelance (talk) 10:14, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kafou Group (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kafou Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 09:56, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kafou Group (July 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kafou Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:13, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]