User talk:B3251
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Your GA nomination of Walter W. White
[edit]The article Walter W. White you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Walter W. White and Talk:Walter W. White/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'd really like to see some progress toward meeting the GA criteria this week. – Reidgreg (talk) 01:06, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Reidgreg, I'm unfortunately going to have to withdraw the GAN for the time being because I'll be extremely busy with school for the next few months. I'll take your suggestions into account and make changes when I can and re-nominate it in the future. Apologies for the inconvenience. B3251(talk) 03:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Don't worry, it's fine. This is a hobby for all of us and other things have to take priority. GAN is one of the places where you often wait months for a review, and nobody can predict if they'll have time to actually respond to the review when it comes along.
- I'll try to summarize at the end of the review what I feel needs to be done to meet the GA criteria, and then close it as 'not promoted'. You or anyone else is free to renominate it at any time, though the next reviewer will probably expect the points I raised to have been addressed.
- Best wishes with your schooling. – Reidgreg (talk) 14:14, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Reidgreg, I'm unfortunately going to have to withdraw the GAN for the time being because I'll be extremely busy with school for the next few months. I'll take your suggestions into account and make changes when I can and re-nominate it in the future. Apologies for the inconvenience. B3251(talk) 03:34, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in
[edit]
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH talk! 23:28, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
DYK for Charles LeBlanc (blogger)
[edit]
On 11 January 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Charles LeBlanc (blogger), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that blogger Charles LeBlanc interviewed a man who carried out a mass shooting the following year? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Charles LeBlanc (blogger). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Charles LeBlanc (blogger)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Walter W. White
[edit]The article Walter W. White you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Walter W. White for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reidgreg -- Reidgreg (talk) 15:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)