User talk:Badabara

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Jewel Ornament of Liberation has been accepted

The Jewel Ornament of Liberation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cerebellum (talk) 01:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cerebellum Yay! Thanks so much for the good news! Badabara (talk) 19:47, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Karmapa page

I'm reaching out in good faith, and adding 3 discussion topics to the article's talk, pinging Badabara. Can we work together on repairing the errors? Thanks. Pasdecomplot (talk) 20:17, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The topic you wish to edit is complex and multi-sided, and the leading paragraph should reflect that. I will take an other look at the talk page. Badabara (talk) 22:33, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Good, thanks for responding. And, thanks for the link to blocking - but which editor requested the block? (Just asking since it was unwarranted - I was correcting info and providing RS.) Pasdecomplot (talk) 22:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pasdecomplot I don't know where the block came from. My guess is it came from an unrelated page. You can look into who/why blocked you etc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:I_have_been_blocked

I am replying to your comments on talk page now... Badabara (talk) 23:06, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jigme (Kagyu lama) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jigme (Kagyu lama) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigme (Kagyu lama) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 08:01, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm JimRenge. An edit that you recently made to Ole Nydahl seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Self-published sources (blogs) like https://allgaeu-rechtsaussen.de/ and https://buddhismus-kontrovers.info/ are not acceptable in wp. Some content was not verifiable with the sources given. Please see WP:BURDEN and WP:OR. Please consider to visit the WP:TEAHOUSE if you need advice how to edit. JimRenge (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JimRenge. A really powerful social norm here on Wikipedia is to assume good faith of our fellow editors. I will assume that you wish to give guidance in earnest. I will take a bit of time to reflect on the edit made, and familiarize myself with the WP:TEAHOUSE. All best wishes, Badabara (talk) 01:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lama Jigme Rinpoche and others

Many thanks for you thanks, it is my pleasure (to please you)! I've been busy improving Draft:Lobsang Nyandak page, which also is worth the effort. If any other difficulty in a page, please contact me. All the very best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 21:47, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

...hmmm. The Draft:Lobsang Nyandak page looks good to me. It looks like you've worked on it quite a lot since it was last declined. Do you think it's ready to pass, or are you still looking for others to contribute? Badabara (talk) 05:52, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rédacteur Tibet, I went ahead and added a bit to the intro. I also have a thought, which is perhaps the page isn't being accepted because of the structure. The "career" section with dates reads a bit like a resume, and that seems to be the criticism? Have you thought of changing the structure of "career" to tell a story? Juicy bits relevant to his legacy and the important role he serves in protecting Tibetan Government-in-Exile. Also there's no mention of his travels in the West... Best Badabara (talk) 06:34, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for your analysis and ideas. I had "resubmitted" the draft following suggestions here [1]. The review may take time. It is said that in the meantime, anyone can improve the page. So, if you have time, it is very useful. As for the structure, I haven't changed it since Timofeytv created the page. I think you are right that it would be good to write a story. There is a page about Lodi Gyari that may help for the structure. You are right also for his travels to the West, it could be more detailed. I lack time these days, so, I appreciate your work. All the very best, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:23, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rédacteur Tibet, I'm glad to see the page was moved to mainspace. Congrats! Badabara (talk) 06:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Badabara. I think Timofeytv made the most important work. It should have been accepted as he proposed it initially. All the best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 12:41, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Buddhism Barnstar

		The Buddhism Barnstar
		Greetings for the biographical page on the Lama Jigme Rinpoche, "kept" today ! --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 10:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Rédacteur Tibet! Couldn't have done it without the help of you and others! All best wishes Badabara (talk) 18:28, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fr:Jigmé Rinpoché

Hi Badabara, I have translated (and more) the page you wrote about Lama Jigme Rinpoche. One user says the references are not sufficiently focused on him. One reference you found is "Gerd Bausch, "Radiant Compassion, The Life of the 16th Gyalway Karmapa, Volume 1." 2018". I noticed in table of contents that this book has a chapter entitled "Lama Jigme Rinpoche" p. 265-271. If you have access to his book, could you verify if it can be used to improve notability of the wikipedia page? Best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 20:57, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rédacteur Tibet. I do have the book by Gerd Bausch, and the chapter you mention is not about Jigme Rinpche, but an account on 16th Karmapa by Jigme Rinpoche. I imagine there are reliable high quality sources in French, not available in English, on the topic of Jigme Rinpoche because Dhagpo Kagyu Ling is located in France.

When I created the Lama Jigme Rinpoche (Kagyu) page it went through a rigorous process and was finally deemed a notable wikipedia page. The process and conversations that transpired are not on the talk page. They are found here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jigme (Kagyu lama). Perhaps this is helpful?

Best of luck! Badabara (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)≤[reply]

So far, it was helpful. As you contributed to Ogyen Trinley Dorje page, fyi : [2]. Best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 21:24, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy/pasting from The Treasury of Lives

In this edit, you copy/pasted from the source with almost no changes, leaving the different spelling used at that site intact. That's a copyright violation. I've removed the copy/pasted material from the article. You must write in your own words, even close paraphrasing is out. Skyerise (talk) 23:00, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sloppy editing on my part. Apologies.

Thank you for your edits on the Drukpa Kunley page. The intro is starting to hold true to his biography! Badabara (talk) 23:44, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 16:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Badabara,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. Additionally, if I may speak on behalf of the WikiProject Buddhism community, congratulations on this milestone. It is heartwarming to see you as an active user after all these years. Take good care, my friend. Namo Buddhaya!

Best regards, Usedbook (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Love it! Nice little milestone. Thank you. Badabara (talk) 03:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damchoe Yongdu

Hi Badabara, I have worked on Draft:Damchoe_Yongdu, would like to have your view about how to improve it for its resubmission. Best wishes, Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 16:22, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reaching out. I'll look up the Khenpo and look at your draft page and see if I can offer feedback. Do you want me to take a crack at editing for readability as well?

All best wishes, Badabara (talk) 02:26, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The author is Sandyroyrocky (talk · contribs). I guess he would agree, since the idea is to make the draft acceptable. I'll send him an email. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 10:23, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He responded you are welcome to edit the draft. --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 21:46, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. If I have questions I'll bring them up on the talk page. Badabara (talk) 00:06, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:White Crane Films

Hi Badabara, thanks for Damchoe Yongdu. I should use your suggestions to improve the draft. I have another : Draft:White Crane Films, I'd like to have your view about it before submitting it. Best wishes, Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 11:53, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I'll take a look Badabara (talk) 03:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting production company and I think worthy of a wikipedia page (encyclopedic information). There were just a few minor grammatical errors. The page seems good to me. It reads well and is informative. Badabara (talk) 04:02, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks. I had request undeletion after the page was deleted due to lack of references [3]. Best wishes, --Rédacteur Tibet (talk) 12:03, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]