User talk:Bobby Cohn
|
![]() | SCAM WARNING! If someone contacts you asking for money to get a draft published, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article—do not trust them! These offers are scams. Report them to paid-en-wp ![]() |
![]() | Notices, archives and other talk page banners. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Draft
[edit]Good day!
Thank you for moving my draft, it is much appreciated by me :)
Slavoj22538 (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
- You are welcome @Slavoj22538. Happy editing! Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 21:44, 1 July 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for taking the time to review my draft for Staycation (TV series). I understand how important reliable sources are, and I’ve included official Emmy Award listings from the NATAS Pacific Southwest Chapter that confirm multiple regional Emmy wins. That said, I noticed they may not be considered reliable or independent — is that the case?
I’ve already removed IMDb and press release-style sources as suggested earlier and tried to keep the tone as neutral and factual as possible. Should I also take out the quote from the Spanish-language article that mentions the producer? The article is clearly an independent one and does not come from the company or is not a paid feature.
Thanks again for your time and feedback! User972364 (talk) 14:40, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @User972364, I'm not sure why you would take the quote out instead of simply attributing it using references. To that point, the entirety of § Development and production, § Spinoffs, § Cast and hosts, § Distribution, and § Reception are unreferenced as well as 11 out of the 14 rows at § Accolades. I don't know what about the article makes it "clearly" independent, but it certainly reads very promotionally. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 14:47, 2 July 2025 (UTC)
- Hi @Bobby Cohn thank you again for your fast reply.
- Regarding the Vallarta Opina article — I just wanted to clarify that it’s independently written by journalist Jorge Bátiz Orozco and published in a regional Mexican news outlet (Vallarta Opina). It is not affiliated with the production company, and I’ve cited it appropriately.
- In terms of verifying the Emmy Awards, I’ve sourced them directly from the official NATAS Pacific Southwest Chapter’s website. These pages list the full award categories, nominees, and recipients across multiple years — all publicly accessible.
- Additionally, I’d like to note that Robert Parks-Valletta, who created and hosts the series, has a dedicated Wikipedia article and is known for his work in television (including NCIS: Los Angeles, Vanderpump Rules, etc). His involvement may add further notability, though I understand that coverage about the series itself is the primary focus.
- Appreciate your reconsideration once again.
- Thanks again, User972364 (talk) 12:14, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for your time reviewing my draft submission titled Maryknoll Taiwanese–English Dictionary. I understand and accept your decision regarding the notability requirements. Unfortunately, despite its uniqueness and importance to the history of Min Nan, the dictionary seems not to have garnered enough attention from scholarship to meet Wikipedia's standards. I appreciate your feedback and will keep this in mind for future contributions. I will consider Wikidata as an alternative venue for documenting the dictionary.
Weilian1982 (talk) 16:04, 3 July 2025 (UTC)
Draft Adrian Leemann
[edit]I’ve reviewed your comments and revised the article accordingly, including adding references. Would you like to take another look at it? Thank you very much! A.lss07m (talk) 12:48, 5 July 2025 (UTC)