User talk:BretDvr

This is BretDvr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PolyAI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 23:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.

https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)

https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/

Thanks. BretDvr (talk) 17:44, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, BretDvr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 23:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PolyAI - Additional Sources - Establishing Notability?

I submitted this article (Draft:PolyAI) about two months ago, and it was rejected because I did not have enough notable sources. I've received a couple of additional sources that I would like to know whether they would rise to the level of notability and allow my article to be published. I could add more information from the articles to the pages, if necessary, but would like to make sure they are valid before resubmitting.

https://www.businessweekly.com.tw/archive/Article?StrId=7008288 (From Taiwan, translated version here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PAdnoed5WI2PuvDDnP-NEU32a1VI_iqK/view?usp=drive_link)

https://startups.co.uk/startups-100/2023/polyai/

Thanks. BretDvr (talk) 18:03, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Encoded was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"Proprietary Models" section is unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PolyAI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Encoded Talk 💬 22:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sohom Datta was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PolyAI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sohom (talk) 04:25, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:PolyAI

Hello, BretDvr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:PolyAI, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:06, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PolyAI

Hello, BretDvr. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "PolyAI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:09, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: PolyAI (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PolyAI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:06, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing an article about a company, and I tried to make it sound as objective and as little like an advertisement as possible, but that seems to be a difficult rope to walk. Do you have any advice on how to avoid this, or can you point to specific examples in my article that cross that line? BretDvr (talk) 00:16, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"compatible with myriad industries"
Industry: "...Contact Center Solutions, Voice Solutions, Customer Support Solutions, Agentic AI" (all of these are buzzwords)

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pythoncoder Thanks. I'll try to do better next draft.

And sorry to pester you with more questions, but is listing the company's clients okay, or does that make it read too much like advertising? I have external cites validating the claim, but I can understand if that crosses the line. BretDvr (talk) 15:36, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]