User talk:Bright-210

External links

Hello Aryan210. As a new user, your only contributions to en:Wikipedia so far have been to add over 150 external links to the tables in the article Shark Tank India season 3. This is contrary to the policy that Wikipedia is not a collection of links to commercial sites and the specific guidance at WP:EL. Please restore that article to the state it was in prior to your edits. I will do that if you do not. Mike Turnbull (talk) 23:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Shark Tank India season 1. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 17:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hailey Rose

Hi Bright-210! I saw you moved Hailey Rose to Hailey Rose (film). Could you please explain why you did this? It doesn't appear that this title needs to be specified with the parentheses, as there are no other articles that could use the title Hailey Rose. I have reverted your move for now. Cheers, ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 03:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bright-210, all of the inbound links from other Wikipedia articles were for the notable film Hailey Rose. I've moved the article you started to Hailey Rose (actress), and left a hatnote at the top of the film article Hailey Rose. Next time you want to make a potentially controversial move like this, please propose the move at the requested moves noticeboard, and get consensus from your fellow editors before moving the article. Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 09:43, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Smalls moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Lana Smalls. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. HeMahon (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Media Mender 📬✍🏻 14:51, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Articles about porn stars

Hi. I see that you've made a couple of articles about porn stars. Any article about a person has to have really good references for things like date of birth. Please don't make any more articles about living people until you read WP:BLP very carefully. Thanks. Counterfeit Purses (talk) 20:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sara Luvv

The article Sara Luvv has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]