User talk:Brownsheep123

February 2023

Hello, I'm Moops. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Blue Bird Corporation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the other lines have citations added, it wouldn't make sense for my line to be removed for no citations when all the other lines have no citations at all. So I request that you keep my line in. Thank you. Brownsheep123 (talk) 17:15, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not every line I add needs to have citations. Some lines have been added without citations and they didn't get taken down, idk why mine did. Brownsheep123 (talk) 17:18, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If the material could have any question at all, then it should have a source. Also, Wikipedia is monitored by human beings, and some bots, so we don't catch everything. Just because something else passed through, doesn't mean that it always should have. TY — Moops ^⋠T⋡ 17:19, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Bird Sigma moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Blue Bird Sigma, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Razer(talk) 17:41, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Blue Bird Vision. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 20:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to IC Bus, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 02:07, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blue Bird Sigma

Hello, Brownsheep123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blue Bird Sigma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blue Bird Sigma

Hello, Brownsheep123. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blue Bird Sigma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:02, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked from editing by wikipedia

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Brownsheep123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Leah.25". The reason given for Leah.25's block is: "Vandalism".

Blocking administrator: ‪Materialscientist‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: User in good standing; softened autoblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:39, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

unblock request 2

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Brownsheep123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Reaper Pro1". The reason given for Reaper Pro1's block is: "Vandalism-only account; see also filter log".

Blocking administrator: ‪ScottishFinnishRadish‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: I'm unwilling to lift this autoblock unless you describe why you are so often editing from the same IP address as blocked vandals. Yamla (talk) 10:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

With all due respect, it is not my choice on which IP Address this account holds. I cannot control who is using my IP Address, nor can I change it. I do not know how they keep on using my IP Address to Vandalize stuff. All I know is that this is not normal and something must be done about this. Brownsheep123 (talk) 17:40, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]