User talk:Bunnypranav

This is Bunnypranav's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

It is 1:38 AM where this user lives.

Selected WikiLove

I've seen a lot of your help across Wikipedia, but especially at WP:AFC/R - just wanted to pop in and say thanks so much :-). Keep it up! Cheers. LR.127 (talk) 14:58, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The bot is breaking pie charts

@Bunnypranav: Your bot is breaking some pie charts, like on Special:Diff/1293565976. I'm tagging Exoplanetaryscience, who created that chart, and who seems to have used a workaround for the pie chart widget to function correctly that the bot isn't fond of. Renerpho (talk) 12:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

On Ennomos family, the bot is engaged in an edit war. I've also reverted it on Eurybates family, Hilda family, Hektor family. Renerpho (talk) 13:03, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Renerpho, sorry for the issues. This is caused as the bot is removing links to the page itself, which is expected behaviour. Unfortunately, this also seems to be breaking the pie charts. Thanks for all the reverts! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav: You're welcome. I hope you can do something about it? Renerpho (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. Ideally the page should not link to itself, that is the root cause (though I am not sure if/how that is possible with the charts). Since I am not running my own code, but this is in fact just Wikipedia:GENFIXES, one would need to update AWB code to add an exemption for the charts. For now, I can stop the bot running on the bot on CW Error #48, which detects a page linking itself. I would really appreciate if you and Exoplanetaryscience can find a better workaround. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bunnypranav: I've just looked at Module:Chart, trying to work around the issue. For the chart to be displayed as intended -- that is, with wikilinks being displayed to some entries in the legend --, one must specify a link for every entry. For those entries that don't need a wikilink, the article itself is linked, which the module (correctly) interprets to display no link at all. This may be a design flaw, an oversight, which should be reported on Module talk:Chart; or a bug, in which case it should go to WP:PHAB.

In the mean time, I see no better workaround with how the module works right now. I believe this is basically the intended way. Renerpho (talk) 15:02, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Renerpho What about Special:Diff/1294096389? I just removed :: and following text. Taken from this particular section of Module:Chart. Granted, now that section links to Ennomos_family#noSuchAnchor, but I don't think that is a big issue. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:19, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think that might actually work, and be easy to do. @Exoplanetaryscience: When you've had time to collect all the articles that are affected, you can implement that fix? Otherwise you know where to reach me, give me the list and I'll do it. Renerpho (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the pages in this genre may be found at Category:Asteroid groups and families which are also in Special:WhatLinksHere/Module:Chart. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 15:43, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's such a stupidly simple fix, it's actually funny. Renerpho (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is breaking bold style

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ReCAPTCHA&diff=1293560175&oldid=1292809552 49.97.26.50 (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The bot made the formatting look worse, but it was not just because of it. The original formatting was also messed up, using span tags, multiple instances of italic and bold, and linking to the title in the lead. The title of a page should not be linked in the same article, and the bolding was there as it was a self-link, see Help:Self link. Regardless, thanks for the notification, and I have manually fixed the formatting. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 05:57, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft EuroDNS

@Bunnypranav. Hi, im writing to you regarding the EuroDNS draft article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:EuroDNS In my second revision, I removed all peacocking terms, and I added more resources. I believe every single statement is backed up by an independent source. Can you please let me know how to proceed? Thank you very much. Fgarcia12345 (talk) 08:51, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you are talking about Special:Diff/1294890847, then I can see only one source added, which also is titles on the founder, not the company. I do not think that is enough significant coverage. Also, the draft is still not according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. An example: EuroDNS's business model centers on being a comprehensive provider for domain-related needs, especially for customers requiring many different international domains. The company's "one-stop-shop" strategy has been credited as a key to its growth, enabling clients to manage a diverse portfolio of domain names across various country-code and generic TLD registries via a single service provider. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:50, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou @Bunnypranav for the feedback. The domain industry competitor Gandi had their wikipedia page approved, I believe they have garnered the same amount of media covered. I will take a look at their sources and build a similar bibliography. I will also edit the langauge to maintain a neutral tone of voice. Thank you very much. Fgarcia12345 (talk) 11:28, 12 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your bot is breaking imagemaps

Hi Bunnypranav, the bot wrongly removed a wikilink to the article itself within an imagemap in Nodens with this edit. That broke the imagemap display (and caused an IP to helpfully delete the entire structure).

Imagemap entries (lines) are required to contain links, even if some of those are to the article itself. Each such entry is effectively a clickable region (box) and it has to contain a link target so that the click can be obeyed. This is mandatory.

In addition, imagemaps including this one are used in multiple articles, so it would be undesirable to have multiple versions of the same imagemap.

Please fix the bot so that it does not damage imagemaps. Many thanks. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:06, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chiswick for the notice, and the fix. Unfortunately, this seems to be a bug of AWB, so I think I'll have to stop the bot from doing changes with that checkwiki error (title linked in text). I'll also maybe file a phab task for fixing this in AWB some time. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:42, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:00, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Barnstar for You!

		The Special Barnstar
		Thank you for assisting me regarding my username. I value your feedback and appreciate that you took time our of your day to assist me. MWFwiki (talk) 02:58, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, happy to give my opinion! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:00, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relayball

Hi I wanted to discuss the article Relay Ball EliG233 (talk) 06:56, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All the needed information regarding how and what to improve in the draft can be found in the links here. Another guide for beginners that I can recommend to you is Help:Your first article ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:16, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank is my Draft currently ready EliG233 (talk) 07:17, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please wait for the review by me or any other reviewer since they are not reviewed in any particular order ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 07:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been waiting and working on it to EliG233 (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LTA evading a block. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 00:38, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Justin Benttinen (09:03, 16 June 2025)

Hi there, I need to delete one of the images here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mosaic_of_Neptune,_Ostia_Antica.jpg because I accidentally uploaded the first one with private information in the exif data. How do I do that? --Justin Benttinen (talk) 09:03, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Justin Benttinen: I have requested the deletion at c:Special:Diff/1044566691 on your behalf, citing this message. It will be done soon by a Wikimedia Commons administrator. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:54, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Justin Benttinen: I am an administrator on Commons, and I declined the request on Commons, for two reasons.

The file is in use.
Commons deletion requests using the speedy deletion option G7 must be made by the uploader.

If I can be of any help with this, feel free to leave a message on my Commons talk page. -- Auntof6 (talk) 13:04, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Auntof6 for the message, you beat me by a few seconds. Justin, please remove the image by undoing Special:Diff/1295862937 with the little undo button on the top. After that, add {{db-author}} on the top of the image's page one you are in the edit window. Hope this helps! ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:07, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Nandha96 (09:57, 16 June 2025)

hello , if i find commercial link inerted in the wikipedia page can i remove it ? --Nandha96 (talk) 09:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Nandha96: Feel free to do so, provided it is following the policy of Wikipedia:External links and WP:NOTPROMO ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft: LoadGen

Hi @Bunnypranav, thanks for the comment.

I’d like to respond to your concern about the sources not demonstrating significant coverage or lacking independence and reliability.

I’ve cited several references that I believe do meet the bar for notability and independence, including:

A detailed technical review by Tim Mangan (2006) originally published on BrianMadden.com and now archived at TMurgent — Mangan is a respected industry expert in EUC and application virtualization, with no affiliation to LoadGen. His write-up goes beyond a mention and evaluates LoadGen’s capabilities directly.
Several blog posts by Ingmar Verheij, an independent EUC consultant, which analyze LoadGen’s components (e.g., Analyzer and LoadBots) in depth.
LoadGen is also featured in research articles by GO-EUC.com — a community-driven EUC testing group — as a key benchmarking tool used in studies from 2021–2025 on Windows 10/11, hardening, and policy performance. These are reproducible test setups, not vendor mentions.
A 2023 article by Chris Twiest published in TechTarget, where LoadGen is directly named as a recommended benchmarking tool in the context of Citrix VDI sizing.
Additional market listings in Tracxn and Capterra confirm LoadGen’s presence in software testing tool directories, though I recognize these aren’t sufficient on their own.

If there are specific sources you find insufficient or concerns you’d recommend I address (e.g., replacing weaker refs or adding inline attribution), I’d really appreciate your input. My goal here is to make this article better and ensure it aligns with WP:N and WP:RS.

Thanks again! Moh216 (talk) 13:41, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is absolutely no point of adding AI comments on talk pages of users. I will not reply to such comments. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:44, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from JazzyOxygen (20:08, 16 June 2025)

Hello - I have just submitted my first Wikipedia article. I'm unclear on the next steps. Do you need to review it? Or do I have to wait for someone else to review it? Any insights would be greatly appreciated. Thank you! --JazzyOxygen (talk) 20:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]