User talk:Chchcheckit

"group" vs. "band" on Bleeding Through

I appreciate your good intentions. You don't necessarily have to choose between the two, however. While consistency is a good thing on many facets of Wikipedia, I've found from experience that not having to repeat the same word so often to mention the same entity improves the quality of the prose. I feel bad, because you probably spent a considerable amount of time making that edit, I'm sorry. mftp dan ^oops 14:24, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Nono idrc tbh // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:26, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

I figured you might want a proper explanation if I reverted it, so I just wanted to make sure we were on the same page. 😁 mftp dan ^oops 14:30, 18 January 2025 (UTC)

Some bubble tea for you!

Hey Check, I just wanted to check in and say you're doing great on Svalbard discography. WikiProject Post-hardcore really appreciates what you've done for Svalbard. I just wanna say - don't feel obligated to turn over for everything someone suggests in one of those nominations unless they provide some background to their suggestions. At the same time, I know I was the one who made the objection on your behalf, so if you thought that was fine it's fine, but you seemed to express uncertainty (perhaps you had rathered my idea?). Anyway, I've been impressed by your rapid growth and repertoire as an editor, but I just wanted to give you some words of confidence and offer a token of good will. You're doing great, and if I may, I'd like to consider you a friend. 🤝 mftp dan oops 14:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

@MFTP Dan:

1. never considered having a nickname and

2. "your rapid growth and repertoire as an editor" really???? damn never considered

3. yeah im a pushover sometimes :))) was mainly trying to avoiding MoS conflict like here. never again

either way, thanks. you can ig :)

// Chchcheckit (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Yeah, you've picked up a pretty impressive trophy rack! You might become responsible for getting me into Heriot. You write enthusiastically of them. I'll listen to them after work. Do you have a favorite for me to start with? mftp dan ^oops 15:13, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

NO WAY WHAT THE FUCK Chchcheckit (talk) 15:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

lmao lmao lmao its not intended. im repping my brit ppl ok Chchcheckit (talk) 15:18, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

ok to answer the question. um, enter the flesh, enter the flesh, and ENTER THE FLESH. that is my answer. Chchcheckit (talk) 15:19, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

You might be surprised how many bands or albums I find and listen to because someone wrote well of them on Wikipedia. I will check it out! mftp dan ^oops 15:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Usually for me it works in reverse lmao but one some occasions yes // Chchcheckit (talk) 15:21, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Intriguing. They are much more sonically death or black metal-influenced than I normally enjoy, but I find myself drawn to exploring them more anyway. 🤔 mftp dan ^oops 14:18, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

Also: if you have the space to do so, can you help me fix an article I've been trying to work on nearly two years? I'm kinda stuck now and desperately need a second opinion/help // Chchcheckit (talk) 12:04, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

In appreciation

		The Good Article Rescue Barnstar
		This is presented to you by the GAR process in recognition of your sterling work in helping Bleeding Through retain its Good Article status. Please feel free to display the GA icon on your userpage. Keep up the good work! ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 11:42, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in the January 2025 GAN backlog drive

		The Minor Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (3 points total) helped reduce the backlog by 185 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. IntentionallyDense (Contribs) 04:13, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Promotion of Svalbard discography

Congratulations, Chchcheckit! The list you nominated, Svalbard discography, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, Hey man im josh (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Lambrini Girls

On 23 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lambrini Girls, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lambrini Girls (pictured) have described their January 2025 debut album Who Let the Dogs Out as "a party for pissed off, gay, angry sluts"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lambrini Girls. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lambrini Girls), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 41,562 views (1,731.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2025 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

DYK for Who Let the Dogs Out (Lambrini Girls album)

On 23 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Who Let the Dogs Out (Lambrini Girls album), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Lambrini Girls (pictured) have described their January 2025 debut album Who Let the Dogs Out as "a party for pissed off, gay, angry sluts"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lambrini Girls. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Who Let the Dogs Out (Lambrini Girls album)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Reply on Spit

It's all good. I don't use this site as much as I used to but i think the article still looks good. Statik N (talk) 17:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi

Hi Chchcheckit, are you okay with reviewing an article not related to music in WP:GARC? Thanks, 750h+ 09:50, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Sure why not. I’ll try Chchcheckit (talk) 14:10, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Great thanks. 750h+ 14:19, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

GARC

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review Temporary National Representation. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #26. 750h+ 14:25, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Speedin' Bullet 2 Heaven

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Speedin' Bullet 2 Heaven you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Locust member -- Locust member (talk) 02:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)