User talk:Citrivescence
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Women in Red February 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements from other communities:
Tip of the month:
Suggestion:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 26 January 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements from other communities: Tip of the month:
Moving the needle:[1]
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 1,669 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:56, 25 February 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
References

The article Meghann Cuniff has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:N. This individual is not notable enough or significant enough in her field to warrant a Wikipedia article. In comparison to most other "legal affair journalists", the vast majority of whom don't have Wikipedia articles of their own, Cuniff has no formal education in law or any legal background through work experience with law firms. She is essentially a freelance or social media "reporter", who's work consists of accessing public court records through lacourt.org or PACER (which anyone can access) and providing her opinion on developments in high profile celebrity cases. And her opinions are not professional legal opinions considering she has no legal background. Furthermore her primary notability is limited to providing social media coverage about 1 celebrity case in Los Angeles. It's certainly not enough warrant a standalone article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red April 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements (Events facilitated by others):
Tip of the month:
Moving the needle: (statistics available via Humaniki tool)
Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 2,657 articles during this period! Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 13:17, 30 March 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Orphaned non-free image File:Rap Sht HBO Max.png
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Rap Sht HBO Max.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 14 April 2025 (UTC)
New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive
[edit]May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol | ![]() |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Women in Red May 2025
[edit]![]()
Announcements (events facilitated by others):
Progress ("moving the needle"):
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 09:19, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging