User talk:Cmrc23
Appearance
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
![]() | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
![]() | This user is a regular and doesn't mind if you template him. |
![]() |
Tendentious editing at article MobiKwik
[edit]Hi, I hope you are doing good. I am contacting you regarding tendentious editing that has been done by two editors at the mainspace article MobiKwik. The users are:
- User:AbhaiTanwar
- User:SloppyKloppy
There is some undisclosed COI most probably, I am unsure weather to undo there edits or not so looking for guidance on that part. Please let me know Macrobreed2 (talk) 04:35, 4 February 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, thanks for the heads up. I'm not an admin or anything and am pretty new to this myself, you could try raising a case at the COI noticeboard, or asking an admin on their talk page.
- In general, I strongly suggest googling the username and the brand or organisation involved with the potential COI, as this often turns up good evidence that the editing is a conflict of interest. I strongly suggest warning the users first (try uw-coi) and revert anything unsourced, contentious, or obviously unneccesary for an article, with a warning on their talk page, but *do* assume good faith! Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 00:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Macrobreed2
as the first user continued their editing after a warning, and a google search implies they may be an employee of the company, I will make a case on the COI noticeboard.Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 00:21, 5 February 2025 (UTC)- Disregard, the edits do not meet the criteria for reporting yet. I will warn them again Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 00:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23, thanks for looking into it. The said users have removed the entire controversy section which was sourced and as you said the username seems like an employee, and you've warned them again. Let's see what happens next! Please notify me if you create a case on the COI noticeboard (like you I'm also a newbie to this). Regards Macrobreed2 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have attempted to revert the COI edits but I am not quite sure if I have removed all of them. Removal of content without explanation should fall under Template:Uw-delete1 though. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 03:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for doing it. As I can see User:Yuvaank made an edit on 27 December in which they summarised that they have removed promotional content but they also removed the controversy section. Macrobreed2 (talk) 19:08, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- I have attempted to revert the COI edits but I am not quite sure if I have removed all of them. Removal of content without explanation should fall under Template:Uw-delete1 though. Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 03:26, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Cmrc23, thanks for looking into it. The said users have removed the entire controversy section which was sourced and as you said the username seems like an employee, and you've warned them again. Let's see what happens next! Please notify me if you create a case on the COI noticeboard (like you I'm also a newbie to this). Regards Macrobreed2 (talk) 03:08, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- Disregard, the edits do not meet the criteria for reporting yet. I will warn them again Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 00:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
- @Macrobreed2
Trouted
[edit]![]() |
Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly. |
You have been trouted for: YOUR REASON HERE 120.29.245.93 (talk) 00:23, 5 February 2025 (UTC) you have made a big mistake
- Hello! What have I done to earn my trouting? Cmrc23 ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ 00:25, 5 February 2025 (UTC)