User talk:Conscious AI-ML

This is Conscious AI-ML's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, QuestDB, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Conscious AI-ML/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Conscious AI-ML! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: QuestDB (February 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of websites). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:QuestDB and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 21:14, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:QuestDB

Hello, Conscious AI-ML. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "QuestDB".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:57, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Contextual AI (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Nearly all of the cited articles are quote-heavy churnalism or press releases.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Contextual AI and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 03:58, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Contextual AI

The article Contextual AI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Heavily promotional (account name doesn't do any favours either), also most sources are from blogs or low-quality journalism sites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GarethBaloney 20:00, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. I respectfully object to the deletion of this article based on the following points:

Regarding Source Quality: The concern about "blogs or low-quality journalism sites" appears to be inaccurate. This article primarily uses high-quality, established sources that meet Wikipedia's reliability standards, including:

· Forbes, TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Reuters, Associated Press

· Industry publications: NVIDIA, SiliconANGLE, Silicon Republic

· Academic sources: arXiv preprint

· Corporate sources: Meta

I specifically removed Medium articles and other self-published sources during editing to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's source quality guidelines.

Regarding Promotional Tone: I acknowledge the concern about promotional language and am committed to revising any sections that may appear non-neutral. The article focuses on factual information about the company's founding, funding rounds, and technological contributions, sourced from independent third-party coverage.

Regarding Notability: Contextual AI meets Wikipedia's notability criteria through:

· Significant coverage in major tech publications

· $80M+ in funding from notable investors

· Founders' role in developing Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) technology

· Coverage by established financial and technology news outlets

Regarding Conflict of Interest: I am not affiliated with Contextual AI, nor do I work for the company or its founders. My motivation for creating this article is to document the notable contributions of the company's founders, who were key figures in developing RAG technology—a method now widely adopted in the AI industry.

As an editor who contributes to AI-related topics, I have made every effort to ensure the article is written in a neutral, encyclopedic tone. I am prepared to continue improving the article's neutrality and welcome specific suggestions for enhancement. Conscious AI-ML (talk) 12:40, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You say that but appear to have only contributed to Contextual AI and Dask (software). Some of it does feel like it was written by AI although I know how unreliable GPTZero is so for now all I have is a hunch. Maybe making a user page can help with future editors not discrediting your work by proving you are a real person, although this is just my opinion. GarethBaloney 13:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! No, the content wasn’t written by AI chatbot. I tried to follow the style and format of similar technology company pages like Scale AI, Mistral AI, and Cohere - focusing on when the company was founded, what it does, who founded it, and what technology it provides, all in a neutral tone and without promotional language.

Today, I also added references to academic papers on RAG technology, which is really shaping the AI field right now. I went through the article to make sure it lines up with Wikipedia’s sourcing standards and tone guidelines. If you look at the pages of Cohere and Scale AI, you’ll see they’re also supported by articles from reputable platforms like TechCrunch, VentureBeat, Forbes, and Fast Company. A lot of the articles backing up this draft are written by the same journalists who cover Contextual AI and RAG technology.

I also contribute to AI topics from another account, so I’m very familiar with Wikipedia’s guidelines and requirements. I’ll keep working on improving the article over time and adding more solid sources as they come out. Conscious AI-ML (talk) 14:19, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Conscious AI-ML. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 06:09, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your feedback. I oppose this deletion and have outlined my objections in the discussion above. Conscious AI-ML (talk) 12:43, 11 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]