User talk:Csendesmark

Welcome!

Hello, Csendesmark, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 22:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hungary

Article protected until 2 May 2012, hope it'll work out. ᴳᴿᴲᴳᴼᴿᴵᴷ☺ᶤᶯᵈᶸᶩᶢᵉ 11:42, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

köh-köh

Szia!

Csak egy rövid megjegyzés Omen1229 vitalapja (pontosabban ezen mondatod "You may also try to insult others with lies but we don't really care, all of those stuff will be removed with time.") kapcsán: ilyet már csak taktikai okokból se illik mondani (még akkor se, ha tényleg így van, illetve akkor főleg nem). -- CoolKoon (talk) 23:53, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been reported

You have been reported here--Omen1229 (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Boccs, de pontossann ezért nem válasszoltam az üznetdre. Inkább máshogy köllenne.....egy iggencsak eeterjett üznetvltási formában....amit én megattam ittend, de te nem.... (de vigyázzá, ha ezen a ódalon körösztű kűűdöd, mee asztot lássák a nípek is) -- CoolKoon (talk) 14:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please hold your conversations in English? Especially in matters where you seem to be discussing potential editing disputes with editors from other nationalities, having conversations in languages that are inaccessible to most others is poor style. Thank you, – Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:11, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, there are times when I try to. But given the example above it doesn't make much difference whether I keep my discussions in English or use Hungarian (since either way they seem to find their way to ANI), don't you think? As for the discussions regarding potential editing disputes, Omen1229's been topic banned, so there doesn't seem to be much point in "conspiring" against him, is there? And besides, those "editors from other nationalities" seem to do the same every once in a while too. -- CoolKoon (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Meghivas

Szia!

Mivel tobb helyen talalkoztam a neveddel a Magyarorszaggal es a magyarokkal kapcsolatos cikkeknel, gondoltam reszt vennel a Wikiproject Hungary ujjaeleszteseben. Jelenleg a WP HU elegge inaktiv allapotban van, ezen szeretnek segiteni az azonos erdeklodesu szerkesztok osszefogasaval, es egy kis eletet lehelni bele, hogy emeljuk a magyarokkal kapcsolatos cikkek szamat es minoseget. Irtam egy rovid vazlatot, hogy mit gondolok most jelenleg, illetve felvetettem par lehetoseget hogyan lehetne kicsit aktivabba tenni a projektet. Lathatod, hogy tobbek kozott a hataron tuli magyarokkal (a Karpat-medenceben es azon kivul is, Eszak-Amerikaban, Ausztraliaban, stb.) foglalkozo muhely letrehozasat is felvetettem, ami szerintem erdekelhet, es amihez orommel vennem ha csatlakoznal (masokhoz is persze, ha gondolod). Nem tudom, hogy mennyire vagy aktiv itt az angol wikin, de minden kicsi segitseg tovabb viszi a projektet. Ha barmi kerdesed lenne tedd fel batran a "Project organization" oldal vitalapjan, itt (figyelolistara tettelek) vagy az en vitalapomon.

Udv,

Thehoboclown (talk) 13:16, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of 2 articles.

Hello. I need somebody to translate articles in Hungarian. Could you help me , please ? If you want , you can write me a message on my discussion page. Articles to translate : Austrian Bridge Federation (Ostrak Bridzs Szövetség) and too Dutch Bridge Federation (Olanda Bridzs Szövetség). 83.205.61.45 (talk) 13:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not editing the Hungarian Wiki anymore. --Csendesmark (talk) 22:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Csendesmark. You have new messages at DeltaQuad's talk page.
Message added 01:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Airplaneman ✈ 01:13, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian people

Please present your arguments on the talk page before reverting. Adrian (talk) 18:25, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I did, and you missing the whole point. Csendesmark (talk) 18:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the argument [1] I genuinely don`t understand it. Please explain. Adrian (talk) 18:30, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About the folklore & landscape pictures

The article doesn't talks about the present-day Hungarian Republic or Hungarian state (or its modern state-borders), but it talks about an ethnic group, the Hungarians. Forexample many minorities live between the borders of modern Hungarian state (Germans Serbs Slovaks Croatians etc..), but this article is about Hungarian people as ethnic group. The origin of buildings in modern Romania modern Slovakia etc.. are not relates to the culture of Slovak people, Serbian or Romanian (Vlach) people (which refer to etchnic groups) These medieval catholic Romanesque Gothic and Renaissance buildings are styles of the Western (catholic - protestant) World, and they aren't related to the culture Orthodox Romanian or Serbian people too... Keep in mind: Just because the borders were changed after the WW I in 1920, the old history and the old past (the cultural history or the history of these medieval and early modern buildings) did not changed.--Relevater (talk) 13:52, 26 February 2013 (UTC)--Relevater (talk) 13:56, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

February 2013

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Adrian (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the info, I just placed markers, in order to answer all of the questions. Didn't know It's forbidden, and I wasn't edit with disruptive attention, sorry again Csendesmark (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian people

I hope you don`t mind contacting you here because the talk page is already overcrowded.

You reverted me and stated that the Croats are the same example. Please tell me that you notice the difference between [[2]] and [[3]] ?

Croats have 1 building image and 2 interior images of buildings, all from Croatia.

If you find a valid example, please let me know.

You still think this is a valid example or you are just trying to start an edit war? Adrian (talk) 23:36, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And this [[File:Dubra.JPG|right|thumb|The Walls of Dubrovnik As I said, they're are not us.

Well, there are lots of other articles which aren't related to Hungarians, maybe you could improve those. Therefore your POV won't violate the main pillar of Wikipedia. And I would prefer the article's talk page regarding this in the future. Csendesmark (talk) 00:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You do understand that Dubrovnik is in Croatia? Ok, and that is 2 buildings? Can we compare to the gallery at the Hungarian people?

Please let me edit articles I wish. Adrian (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please check the talk page, [4], looks like this is against the WP:IG beside the practice elsewhere on the project that I was pointing out. Please continue the discussion there if you wish to participate. Adrian (talk) 00:27, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit

Hello, I suggest you to read Wikipedia:Minor edit#When not to mark an edit as a minor edit. I see several instances in your contributions which are not in compliance with the recommendations, most obviously [5]. Regards, Nemo 22:24, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Fundamental rights after 2010 elections

Hello, please discuss the article on the article's talk page. I'll reply you there, but it seems I've already addressed your concern. --Nemo 08:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Csendesmark. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]