User talk:DYC TY

This is DYC TY's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1977 NCAA Division III soccer tournament (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Significa liberdade was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1977 NCAA Division III soccer tournament and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, DYC TY! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, DYC TY, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

DYC TY, good luck, and have fun. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 16:00, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

Hello, I'm Tarlby. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, PayPal Honey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 21:11, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PayPal Honey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Please get familiar with Wikipedia:Reliable sources. It doesn't matter that it's a controversy, some would even say that a controversy makes it even more important that it is properly sourced. win8x (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I might be misunderstanding the purpose of a "Controversy" section on a Wikipedia article are we only adding credible controversies? DYC TY (talk) 03:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can add controversies as long as they're backed up by numerous reliable sources. The sources prove that it happened, so we don't come off as cancelling random people/things, if that makes sense - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It does make sense! DYC TY (talk) 19:24, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No disrespect to the person who made the video, but I can also create a YouTube video in an attempt to create a controversy. If it affects PayPal Honey in any way, a reliable source will talk about it. win8x (talk) 03:56, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's how that works... - OpalYosutebito (talk) 03:57, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is PayPal Honey edit warring. Thank you. Tarlby ^{(t) (c)} 05:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to PayPal Honey

Hello, User:DYC TY! I recently reverted your recent edit to PayPal Honey because it did not appear to follow Wikipedia's guidelines citing secondary sources. In general, information on Wikipedia should be sourced to reliable sources which are independent of the subject. If you would like to add back this information, you may, but please provide a secondary source. If you would otherwise like to dispute this, you may take your questions or concerns to the page's talk page, Talk:PayPal Honey. Thanks, and happy editing! guninvalid (talk) 05:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]