User talk:Donald Albury
 | Warning about paying for editing or other actions on Wikipedia This user is not affiliated with any group or organization that charges a fee for any activity relating to Wikipedia. If you have seen an advertisement for, or received any kind of message from, someone who claims that they can help you with any kind of issue with Wikipedia for a payment, it may be a scam. If any such advertisement or message refers to this user name, please  mail me a report. |
| This is a Wikipedia user discussion page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Donald_Albury. |
 |
| To leave a message on this page, click here. If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply. *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the rules above may be immediately deleted. |
|
| --> Archive 14 - Archive 13 - Archive 12 - Archive 11 - Archive 10 -
Archive 9 - Archive 8 - Archive 7 - Archive 6 - Archive 5 - Archive 4 - Archive 3 - Archive 2 - Archive 1 |
Archives |
|
Licensing rights granted to Wikimedia Foundation |
|---|---|
| I grant non-exclusive permission for the Wikimedia Foundation Inc. to relicense my text and media contributions, including any images, audio clips, or video clips, under any copyleft license that it chooses, provided it maintains the free and open spirit of the GFDL. This permission acknowledges that future licensing needs of the Wikimedia projects may need adapting in unforeseen fashions to facilitate other uses, formats, and locations. It is given for as long as this banner remains. |
 | This user is aware of the designation of the following topics as contentious topics:
|
Dunedin, FL
[edit]I represent the Dunedin History Museum and the city historian. The reference link(s) to the first land grant and the incorporation of the city is from an old incorrect city of Dunedin page. The dates 1852 and 1925 are incorrect for the first land grant and the founding of the city.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.96.115.241 (talk • contribs) 15:10 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Arecaceae
[edit]In fact that editor has repeatedly refused to advise me of what the problem is. I'm surprised to hear that editor is an experienced editor as I had not seen need to check. Right off attempting to inject FRINGE political bias and going on to repeatedly demand I debate positions I don't hold is strange for an experienced editor. I have said several times that we can remove and change any parts of my added text and asked how he wants to do that: He still refuses to reply instead insisting on these debates. Invasive Spices (talk) 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
Technical news
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
The Signpost: 19 October 2024
[edit]- News and notes: One election's end, another election's beginning
- Recent research: "As many as 5%" of new English Wikipedia articles "contain significant AI-generated content", says paper
- In the media: Off to the races! Wikipedia wins!
- Contest: A WikiCup for the Global South
- Traffic report: A scream breaks the still of the night
- Book review: The Editors
- Humour: The Newspaper Editors
- Crossword: Spilled Coffee Mug
Invitation to participate in a research
[edit]Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – November 2024
[edit]News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2024).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Oversighter changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a discussion, the discussion-only period proposal that went for a trial to refine the requests for adminship (RfA) process has been discontinued.
- Following a request for comment, Administrator recall is adopted as a policy.
Technical news
- Mass deletions done with the Nuke tool now have the 'Nuke' tag. This change will make reviewing and analyzing deletions performed with the tool easier. T366068
Arbitration
- RoySmith, Barkeep49 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2024 Arbitration Committee Elections. ThadeusOfNazereth and Dr vulpes are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate from 3 November 2024 until 12 November 2024 to stand in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections.
- The Arbitration Committee is seeking volunteers for roles such as clerks, access to the COI queue, checkuser, and oversight.
Miscellaneous
- An unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in November 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
In answer
[edit]This isn't evidence. But I see this kind of stuff more often. Many are much much better at it. And this is merely one CT area. Folks are creating these EC accounts and sitting on some of them. (I have no way of knowing, but they are worth money to someone.) They're literally doing nothing wrong. Until they are. Don't we know somebody who does the math on new accounts and ECs? BusterD (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 6 November 2024
[edit]- From the editors: Editing Wikipedia should not be a crime
- In the media: An old scrimmage, politics and purported libel
- Special report: Wikipedia editors face litigation, censorship
- Traffic report: Twisted tricks or tempting treats?
Stump harvesting deletion
[edit]Re: your message re your deletion of my inserted text in 'Stump Harvesting' I don't know anything about harvesting stumps, Donald, I don't have any citation for whatever it was I put in and you took out and I have no time to look for one. But I'm not as sure as you are that it needs citing. I merely added something to the article that I had happened to see in another Wikipedia article on the same or similar topic just before I read the 'Stump Harvesting' article. That other article, the title of which I have forgotten, was apparently authoritative enough to be left undisturbed and undeleted by any eagle-eyed monitor like yourself. If you look at whatever you deleted and you know how to find it, you will be able to discover my source somewhere else in Wikipedia. When you find that article, you should doubtless give it the same careful scrutiny you have just shown on 'Stump Harvesting'. If it passes muster, and if you think more info is better than less, you might want to re-stick it wherever I stuck it in 'Stump Harvesting'. Doubtless there is some way to assure a reader that some blob of info has been accepted and embraced elsewhere in Wikipedia, but I don't know what it is and despair of ever being able to master the complex web of arcana that enables 'anyone' to edit Wikipedia. So, duly chastened and abashed, and now certain I should limit my Wikipedia efforts to just humbly fixing grammar and spelling, I am, Yours truly, Bob Projansky 97.120.20.119 (talk) 02:35, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
- The policy at WP:Verifiability requires that all content in Wikipedia article be verifiable, and for certain cases, including when the content has been challenged, content must be supported by an in-line citation to a reliable source. It doesn't matter what you may have seen in another article. Wikipedia is a user-generated source, and is therefore not a reliable source and cannot be used in citations in Wikipedia. Donald Albury 13:25, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research
[edit]Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,