Jump to content

User talk:Invasive Spices

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Library

[edit]

Whoever did that thank you. I had wanted to do that but couldn't understand how to get it. Invasive Spices (talk) 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Blowup is an interesting choice of words. That film inspired The Conversation and othersab. That makes me curious why this term was used. Invasive Spices (talk) 23 January 2023 (UTC)

The redirect Borer (diambiguation) to the article Borer has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 20 § Redirects with "(diambiguation)" until a consensus is reached.

Unsigned comment by Dsuke1998AEOS at 01:44, 20 May 2023

The redirect Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 18 § Religiously motivated antipathy toward Native Americans in the United States until a consensus is reached.

The redirect Film rehearsal in the United States has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 19 § Film rehearsal in the United States until a consensus is reached. Unsigned comment by Mdewman6‬ 23:54, 19 June 2023

The redirect Northern Scandinavia has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 10 § Northern Scandinavia until a consensus is reached. 130.234.120.6 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article NPR1 (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant dab page. I've already added hatnotes to the relevant pages. BLAR reverted because the other editor thinks this should be deleted instead, so I guess I'm PRODing instead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Toadspike [Talk] 10:45, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Toadspike: The more obvious option would be to add the other NPR1s to the dab, beginning with radio. Invasive Spices (talk) 22:09, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@BkonradInvasive Spices (talk) 22:10, 13 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's the problem – there isn't anything else called "NPR1", and the radio app doesn't have an article. I've added hatnotes to NPR1 already, so readers can find the other two articles if they land there. Since there is a primary topic, the disambiguation page at a "(disambiguation)" title is not useful. Toadspike [Talk] 05:51, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello @Toadspike:
there isn't anything else called "NPR1"
NPR-1 (disambiguation).
and the radio app doesn't have an article
I don't understand the problem – there are many of those MOS:DABSECTION.
Invasive Spices (talk) 19:54, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting, I didn't know that DAB page existed. If we merge all the entries from NPR1 and NPR-1 to a single DAB page then it would have a valid reason for existing. I might add the entries from NPR1 to NPR-1.
The problem with NPR1 right now is that it has a primary topic, NPR1, so readers land at that article first. From there, via hatnotes, they can get to the two other articles (including the section about NPR One, the radio app) within a single click via the hatnotes. There's no point having a hatnote to a DAB page instead, which would require all readers to make two clicks to get to the other pages. So, for now, the DAB is redundant. Toadspike [Talk] 20:41, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I should also say that I would agree with WP:PRIMARYTOPIC but for the existence of other things. Invasive Spices (talk) 20:45, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Sussexes settle in California has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 April 25 § Sussexes settle in California until a consensus is reached. estar8806 (talk) 18:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]