User talk:Deathlock97

Welcome!

Hello, Deathlock97!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, 〜 Adflatuss • talk 13:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Regarding an edit you made to Latino World Order I have removed it. We do not do part-time members soley for the reason they are unsourced. Please do not add material again without reliable sources that are in line with Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources or you could be blocked from editing. Lemonademan22 (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Latino World Order shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please re-read what Lemonademan said. We don't do part time members. — Czello ^(music) 08:06, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're continuing to ignore any kind of communication we've tried to make with you and are resuming edit warring. Please stop. — Czello ^(music) 12:14, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Lemonademan22 (talk) 00:33, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Latino World Order. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Aoidh (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that when there is a content dispute, WP:BRD should be followed and a discussion should take place on the article's talk page. Moving forward, please discuss contentious changes on an article's talk page rather than continuing to revert once you know that the content being added has been reverted. Disagreements happen all the time on Wikipedia, and discussion is an essential part of the dispute resolution process. Edit warring is disruptive to articles and continued edit warring may result in longer blocks to prevent this disruption, up to and including an indefinite block. - Aoidh (talk) 05:45, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]