User talk:Disacaresolutions

This is Disacaresolutions's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Upol Amin (March 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Upol Amin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Disacaresolutions! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello Disacaresolutions. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Disacaresolutions. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Disacaresolutions|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 11:42, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I want to clarify that I have no paid affiliation with the subject of the article or any related organization. I am not receiving, nor do I expect to receive, any compensation for my contributions to Wikipedia. My edits were made in good faith with the intention of improving the quality and accuracy of the content, and not as part of any paid advocacy.

If any of my edits gave the impression of a conflict of interest, that was not my intention, and I’m happy to discuss or revise them if necessary. Please let me know if there are specific concerns that need to be addressed further. Disacaresolutions (talk) 12:49, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In this edit, you added a link to disacaresolution.com.au. Surely that isn't coincidental? (Note that user names may not be names of companies or organisations, and your name has been flagged at Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention; it is possible that an administrator will block your account for that reason.) --bonadea contributions talk 13:12, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I want to clarify that I am not from Australia, nor am I affiliated with DisaCare Solutions in any capacity. My name is Mehedi, and I live in Bangladesh. For research purposes, I have made one contribution in the healthcare sector and intend to explore more topics in this field.

Out of humor, I used the username, and I understand that it may not look appropriate. However, I assure you that there was no ill intent behind it. Disacaresolutions (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disacaresolutions (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

EdwardVanReighman (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I would like to request an unblock and a username change to "EdwardVanReighman."

I want to clarify that I have not received any payment for my contributions, nor was my intent to promote any business or organization. My previous username was chosen out of humor, and I now understand that it may have given the wrong impression.

I acknowledge the reason for my block and will ensure that my future contributions align with Wikipedia's guidelines. My primary focus is to contribute to healthcare-related topics, as I have previously made one research-based contribution in this field. Additionally, I have experience in the newspaper industry in Bangladesh, specifically at The Daily Star, and intend to use my expertise to contribute meaningfully to Wikipedia.

I appreciate your time in reviewing my request and look forward to making constructive contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you. Disacaresolutions (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not a credible explanation. -- asilvering (talk) 06:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You say your username was chosen out of humor, but your first edit included a link to a website by that name. What is your relationship with the website/business? 331dot (talk) 15:04, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand how the link might cause confusion, and I sincerely apologize for that. To clarify, while my username was chosen in a lighthearted way, I didn’t intend to promote the website. I’ve been working on a research topic related to healthcare, and during my research, I came across the website and thought it might be a relevant resource to include. I didn’t realize it would be seen as promotional, and that was never my intention.

I assure you that I have no affiliation with the website or any related business, and I’ll be more careful in the future to ensure my contributions align with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Disacaresolutions (talk) 15:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I understand the severity of the situation and would like to change my username to something that is not tied to any organization. Disacaresolutions (talk) 15:27, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any connection to DanendraAndrew? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No I do not have any connections to the aforementioned person. Disacaresolutions (talk) 15:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{checkuser needed}} -- asilvering (talk) 23:53, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The networks of interest are pretty spammy. Probably somewhere in the realm of inconclusive for a result. Izno (talk) 01:43, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that's a "both hired by the same person" then. @Disacaresolutions, paid editing on Wikipedia is acceptable under certain circumstances - see WP:PAID. It's not really that hard to follow these rules. You're not going to be unblocked until you do, since the rest of us weren't born yesterday. -- asilvering (talk) 06:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Compare to Draft:Upol Amin. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:48, 26 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This request was clearly generated by an AI. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn’t completely disagree with this statement; I use AI chat models to correct grammatical mistakes in my sentences and paragraphs. Disacaresolutions (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

However, my request is sincere when I say that my goal moving forward is to contribute honestly. As I am new, I made a mistake and sincerely apologize for it. I understand the importance of this going forward and respectfully ask for a second chance. Disacaresolutions (talk) 20:53, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page posts are not expected to be grammatically and stylistically perfect. We want to hear from you, not an AI. 331dot (talk) 20:57, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, going forward you wont hear me try to be stylistically perfect in talk page posts. Disacaresolutions (talk) 20:59, 25 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]