User talk:DoItFastDoItUrgent

Welcome!

Hello, DoItFastDoItUrgent, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Yuh-Line Niou. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 13:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Circumcision controversies

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Circumcision controversies, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:55, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

vandalism?

I saw your report about the IP editor. It wasn't obvious vandalism, so I think it's in the wrong place. See WP:RAA. ScienceFlyer (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the editor who addressed my report was of the same opinion. I just left a formal, good-faith warning on the IP editor's talk page, so that, if they continue making similar edits, there's documentation that they've had false balance explained to them. I assume that any block that was placed on their account in January 2025 mandating that they formally register in order to make any further edits was only temporary. DoItFastDoItUrgent (talk) 19:32, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

—Fortuna, imperatrix 16:52, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My edit was in no way disruptive (in either intent or effect) and was carefully explained in the edit summary. Thanks for your concern, though. DoItFastDoItUrgent (talk) 17:17, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This[1] "some editors" comment is pretty bad though. Any more of that and you can expect to be in line for sanctions. Bon courage (talk) 17:31, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]